Diabetes Metab J > Volume 42(2); 2018 > Article
Park, Kim, Choi, Nam, Lee, Lee, Son, Park, Shin, Won, Moon, Kim, and Suh: Hemorheologic Alterations in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Presented with an Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Background

Hemorheologic indices are known to be related to vascular complications in variable clinical settings. However, little is known about the associations between hemorheologic parameters and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the changes of hemorheologic environment inside of blood using hemorheologic parameters, especially the elongation index (EI) and critical shear stress (CSS) in diabetics with versus without AMI.

Methods

A total of 195 patients with T2DM were enrolled. Patients were divided into the study group with AMI (AMI+, n=77) and control group (AMI−, n=118) who had no history of coronary artery disease. Hemorheologic parameters such as EI and CSS were measured and compared between the two groups.

Results

The EI was lower (30.44%±1.77% in AMI+ and 31.47%±1.48% in AMI−, P<0.001) but the level of CSS was higher (316.13±108.20 mPa in AMI+ and 286.80±85.34 mPa in AMI−, P=0.040) in the AMI+. The CSS was significantly related to the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (R2=0.497, P<0.001) and use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (R2=0.574, P=0.048).

Conclusion

Diabetics with AMI resulted in adverse hemorheologic changes with lower EI and higher CSS compared to diabetic subjects without AMI. Evaluation of the hemorheologic parameters may provide valuable supplementary information for managing patients with AMI and T2DM.

INTRODUCTION

Erythrocytes play a crucial role in the transport of oxygen and carbon dioxide via the blood flow through the circulatory system. One of the unique capabilities of erythrocytes is that they are extremely deformable as they progressively elongate under shear stress and form ellipsoids with their long axis aligned with the flow. Thus erythrocytes are capable of entering and transiting blood capillaries, which are narrower than the diameter of a resting erythrocyte [1]. Hemorheologic abnormalities have been observed in various clinical situations including diabetes, ischemic heart diseases (IHDs), hypertension, etc. [2,3,4,5], and many physicians have been trying to apply them to various clinical fields. There are many hemorheologic indices including the plasma viscosity, hematocrit, fibrinogen, erythrocyte deformability (ED), and critical shear stress (CSS).
Of those, the CSS is defined as the minimum shear stress required for dispersing the aggregates, and is one of the red blood cell (RBC) aggregation indices. A higher value of the CSS might be associated with increased thrombosis as a trigger for the rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque in acute coronary syndrome [3,6]. Diabetes, meanwhile, affects the RBC function through an interaction with its membrane and intracellular constituents. ED has been demonstrated to be impaired in diabetes, especially in the case of coexisting microvascular complications. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that diabetes is associated with a pathological hemorheologic alteration, which might contribute to an impaired coronary blood flow in coronary artery disease (CAD) [7,8]. However, little is known about the association to hemorheologic indices and acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) in the situation of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the changes of hemorheologic environment inside of blood using hemorheologic parameters, especially the ED and CSS with versus without AMI in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Study design

A total 542 patients (study group [AMI+, n=208] from cardiology division and control group [AMI−, n=334] from endocrinology division) were enrolled in this study from March to December 2014. We excluded some patients who were under clinical situations that might directly influence the ED (secondary erythrocytosis [n=1], under chemotherapy due to malignancy [n=1], type 1 diabetes mellitus [T1DM; n=1], under regular hemodialysis [n=2], hepatic failure [n=1]). All patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of an AMI (AMI+) and those without it (AMI−). Of AMI+, subjects without history of T2DM (n=128) were excluded. Of AMI−, if any history of IHD or previous coronary intervention such as coronary balloon angioplasty and/or a coronary stent implantation, was present, they (n=116) were also excluded due to clarify the hemorheologic effect on newly developed IHD (77 patients in AMI+ and 118 patients in AMI−) (Fig. 1). Institutional Review Board (IRB 2014-01-494) approved this study from Yeungnam University Medical Center and written informed consent was acquired from all patients.
Diabetes was diagnosed by demonstrating any one of the following: fasting plasma glucose level ≥126 mg/dL, plasma glucose at 2 hours after oral glucose load ≥200 mg/dL, and random plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dL with classic hyperglycemic symptoms. Classification of T1DM and T2DM was based on integration of clinical symptoms, insulin antibody, absolute insulin deficiency, and family history [9]. An MI was defined as the presence of at least two of the following: anginal pain, elevation of the creatine kinase concentration greater than three times the upper limit of normal, and/or electrocardiographic changes suggesting an MI [10].
A blood sample was taken during the first visit to the endocrinology outpatient department in the cases of AMI−. In the cases of AMI+, the laboratory examinations of the blood samples were performed anytime within 3 days prior to invasive coronary intervention procedures after being admitted to the intensive care unit or emergency department. In case of individual situation which early coronary intervention was needed to be done, blood sample was taken just before coronary intervention. We implanted second generation drug-eluting stents in all patients classified as being in the AMI+. The hemorheologic parameters were analyzed by routine laboratory assays. The ED, which was quantified by an elongation index (EI; measured at a constant shear stress of 3 pascal [Pa] %), and the CSS were measured by a microfluidic ektacytometer (Rheoscan-D®; Rheo-Meditech, Seoul, Korea) using a disposable kit [11], and the other hemorheologic parameters were compared between the two groups. The EI was calculated from the dimensions of the major (L) and minor (W) axes of an ellipsoid at 3 Pa, EI=[L−W]/[L+W]; this is expressed as a percentage (Fig. 2). The homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), as a marker of insulin resistance, was calculated using the following formula: HOMA-IR=fasting plasma insulin (µU/mL)×fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)/405; and the homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β), which means the function of the β-cells of the pancreas, was calculated as the fasting plasma insulin (µU/mL)×360/(fasting glucose [mg/dL]−63) [12].
The current medications at the time of the blood sampling were also analyzed because some medications, releasing nitric oxide (NO) or modulating the bioactivity of NO, could influence the value of the EI by increasing the NO concentration in the blood [13,14]. The structural and functional echocardiographic parameters including the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured by transthoracic echocardiography during hospitalization.

Statistics

The results are reported as the mean±standard deviation for numerical variables and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. The independent t-test was used to compare the group continuous variables and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to compare the categorical variables. A multivariate linear regression analysis was used to demonstrate any significant factors determining the EI and CSS (variable were as follows; sex, age, hypertension, history of cerebrovascular accident, smoking, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, pharmacologic status, LVEF, E/E′ ratio, white blood cell, hemoglobin, red cell distribution width, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, total protein, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR], glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c], total cholesterol, cystatin C, and insulin resistance/sensitivity indices). IBM SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analysis and statistical significance was accepted for P<0.05.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics were shown in Table 1. Sixty percent of the population was male with the mean age of 64 years old. There were no significant differences between the two groups except echocardiographic parameters which seemed to be natural consequences caused by IHD. The left ventricular systolic function (LVEF: 47.68%±10.21% in AMI+ vs. 64.00%±4.33% in AMI−, P<0.001) was lower and the regional wall motion index (1.41±0.32 in AMI+ vs. 1.00±0.01 in AMI−, P<0.001) was higher in AMI+.

Laboratory findings and medical treatment at baseline

The renal function, represented by the serum creatinine (1.85±1.78 mg/dL in AMI+ vs. 1.07±0.34 mg/dL in AMI−, P<0.001) and estimated GFR (54.16±23.63 mL/min in AMI+ vs. 73.62±17.30 mL/min in AMI−, P<0.001), was decreased in AMI+. The total bilirubin (0.90±0.33 mg/dL in AMI+ vs. 0.78±0.26 mg/dL in AMI−, P=0.006) and aspartate transaminase (39.04±27.77 IU/L in AMI+ vs. 26.83±13.90 IU/L in AMI−, P<0.001) were higher in the AMI+. The blood sugar level, insulin level during a fasting state, and HbA1c level did not significantly differ between the two groups, as well as the parameters related with insulin resistance (HOMA-IR and HOMA-β) (Table 2).
The use of insulin (15.6% of AMI+ and 28.0% of AMI−, P=0.045) and metformin (22.1% of AMI+ and 55.1% of AMI−, P<0.001) were significantly different between two groups. Another detailed medical treatment at baseline was described in Supplementary Table 1.

Hemorheologic findings

Red cell distribution width (13.75%±1.30% in AMI+ vs. 13.15%± 0.87% in AMI−, P<0.001) was higher in AMI+. The number of platelets was lower in the AMI+ (225.12±66.36 K/µL in AMI+ vs. 253.52±80.07 K/µL in AMI−, P=0.011). The EI at 3 Pa was significantly lower (30.44%±1.77% in AMI+ vs. 31.47%±1.48% in AMI−, P<0.001) (Fig. 3A), while the level of CSS was significantly higher in AMI+ (316.13±108.20 mPa in AMI+ vs. 286.80±85.34 mPa in AMI−, P=0.040) (Fig. 3B). On multiple linear regression analysis, the level of CSS was significantly related to the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; R2=0.497, P<0.001) and the use of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor (R2=0.574, P=0.048) (Table 3). Estimated GFR was correlated well with EI (r=0.375, P<0.001) but inversely correlated with the level of CSS (r=−0.317, P<0.001) (Fig. 4). No correlation was observed between EI and the level of CSS (r=−0.124, P=0.090) (Fig. 5).

HbA1c and EI

There was no significant difference on the level of HbA1c between two groups as shown Table 2. However, of all patients regardless of groups, the level of HbA1c was also inversely correlated with the EI (r=−0.161, P=0.029) (Fig. 6).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that diabetic subjects with AMI had worse hemorheologic environment through reduced ED and CSS examined by ektacytometer. Moreover, increased CSS was associated with higher ESR and use of DPP-4 inhibitors might decrease the level of CSS.
It is already well known that progressive worsening of the ED by an impaired glucose tolerance has been found to be an indicator of microangiopathy [8,15,16]. These complications were caused by the composition of various mechanisms as follows: progressive accumulation of HbA1c, inhibition of NO-mediated vasodilation, and endothelial injury due to an increased release of free fatty acids and other adipocytokines [17]. Endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, an impaired vascular function, and the prothrombotic status [18,19] provoked by the multiple and complex mechanisms mentioned above might be thought to provoke coronary arterial events.
Moreover, in large vessels like epicardial coronary arteries, the blood behaves as a continuous liquid, and the dominant factor of the blood flow is its viscosity. The blood viscosity in large vessels mainly depends on the hematocrit, plasma viscosity, erythrocyte aggregation, and deformability. In addition, since there is a constant varying of the blood flow, perfusion pressure, and shear rate, depending on the cardiac cycle, the coronary vessel system is regarded as a special part of the circulation [20]. So it can be inferred that hemorheologic factors and hemodynamic factors play an important role in the development of CAD. Especially, an altered EI could serve as a trigger for the rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque, which would aggravate a thrombus formation that would lead to a clinical syndrome like an AMI, since several studies have proven a connection between a reduced ED and coronary vascular complications [3,21]. CSS, one of the erythrocyte aggregation indices, was statistically higher in the AMI group, which meant that a higher power to disperse the RBCs is needed in that situation. It is a major determinant of the blood viscosity along with the ED.
The blood concentration of HbA1c affects the alteration in the erythrocyte structure by oxidative stress, which results in a hemorheologic disturbance like a decrease in the EI even for a relatively short exposure time [15,22]. As an indicator of the blood sugar control for the last 3 months, the HbA1c was also inversely correlated with the EI in this study, and was consistent with the previous studies [8]. The link between the EI and renal function already exhibited an agreement with an earlier study [23] in which there was a progressive increase in the EI along with a progression of the renal impairment (Fig. 5).
Diverse factors were related to the CSS. One of them, fibrinogen, has a strong effect on the CSS [24], causing the CSS to increase proportional to the fibrinogen concentration. On the other hand, the CSS is a hematocrit-independent indicator [25]. To date, there have been no data about the relationship between the CSS and HbA1c. On the contrary, regarding the relationship of the above EI and HbA1c, the CSS was presumed to have a positive correlation with the HbA1c in our study. Recently, Xue et al. [24] demonstrated that a reduced ED and increased fibrinogen levels play a synergistic role in an increasing CSS. However, there was no definite positive correlation between the CSS and EI, but there was a tendency observed in our study, which could be overcome if there was a larger population than in this study (Fig. 6).
A higher ESR was associated with higher CSS and use of DPP-4 inhibitors might decrease the level of CSS in our study. Beyond the relationship already known between the ESR and CSS, DPP-4 inhibitors also have a protective effect on cardiovascular diseases through various factors including insulin resistance, oxidative stress, immunity modulation, and anti-apoptotic properties in the cardiovascular system [26,27].
There is accumulating evidence of a relationship between HbA1c and microangiopathy; however, we did not consider coexisting diabetic microvascular complications in these patients. We did not analysis the other factors including the hyperviscosity and fibrinogen, which might have played a significant role in the erythrocyte aggregation such as CSS.
In conclusion, the ED was reduced in the patients with an AMI and T2DM, while the CSS was higher in the same group. The ED and CSS might be one of the possible mechanisms of the development of an AMI in patients with T2DM. An evaluation of the hemorheologic parameters, including the EI and CSS, may provide valuable supplementary information for the evaluation and management of IHD in T2DM.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the Yeungnam University, Korea.

NOTES

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary Table 1

Medical treatment at baseline
dmj-42-155-s001.pdf

REFERENCES

1. DeMaria AN. Lies, damned lies, and statistics. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1430-1431.
crossref pmid
2. Damaske A, Muxel S, Fasola F, Radmacher MC, Schaefer S, Jabs A, Orphal D, Wild P, Parker JD, Fineschi M, Munzel T, Forconi S, Gori T. Peripheral hemorheological and vascular correlates of coronary blood flow. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2011;49:261-269.
crossref pmid
3. Lee BK, Durairaj A, Mehra A, Wenby RB, Meiselman HJ, Alexy T. Hemorheological abnormalities in stable angina and acute coronary syndromes. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2008;39:43-51.
crossref pmid
4. Hacioglu G, Yalcin O, Bor-Kucukatay M, Ozkaya G, Baskurt OK. Red blood cell rheological properties in various rat hypertension models. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2002;26:27-32.
pmid
5. Carter C, McGee D, Reed D, Yano K, Stemmermann G. Hematocrit and the risk of coronary heart disease: the Honolulu Heart Program. Am Heart J 1983;105:674-679.
crossref pmid
6. Corti R, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Pathogenetic concepts of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41(4 Suppl S):7S-14S.
crossref
7. Marossy A, Svorc P, Kron I, Gresova S. Hemorheology and circulation. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2009;42:239-258.
crossref
8. Shin S, Ku YH, Ho JX, Kim YK, Suh JS, Singh M. Progressive impairment of erythrocyte deformability as indicator of microangiopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2007;36:253-261.
pmid
9. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2014. Diabetes Care 2014;37(Suppl 1):S14-S80.
crossref pmid
10. Singh M, Gersh BJ, McClelland RL, Ho KK, Willerson JT, Penny WF, Holmes DR Jr. Predictive factors for ischemic target vessel revascularization in the Prevention of Restenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:198-203.
crossref pmid
11. Shin S, Ku Y. Hemorheology and clinical application: association of impairment of red blood cell deformability with diabetic nephropathy. Korea Aust Rheol J 2005;17:117-123.
12. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28:412-419.
crossref pmid
13. Napoli C, Ignarro LJ. Nitric oxide-releasing drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2003;43:97-123.
crossref
14. Bor-Kucukatay M, Wenby RB, Meiselman HJ, Baskurt OK. Effects of nitric oxide on red blood cell deformability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;284:H1577-H1584.
crossref pmid
15. Singh M, Shin S. Changes in erythrocyte aggregation and deformability in diabetes mellitus: a brief review. Indian J Exp Biol 2009;47:7-15.
pmid
16. Marcinkowska-Gapinska A, Kowal P. Blood fluidity and thermography in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease in comparison to healthy subjects. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2006;35:473-479.
pmid
17. Singleton JR, Smith AG, Russell JW, Feldman EL. Microvascular complications of impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 2003;52:2867-2873.
crossref pmid
18. Ando J, Yamamoto K. Vascular mechanobiology: endothelial cell responses to fluid shear stress. Circ J 2009;73:1983-1992.
crossref pmid
19. Cade WT. Diabetes-related microvascular and macrovascular diseases in the physical therapy setting. Phys Ther 2008;88:1322-1335.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Kesmarky G, Toth K, Habon L, Vajda G, Juricskay I. Hemorheological parameters in coronary artery disease. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 1998;18:245-251.
pmid
21. Cecchi E, Marcucci R, Paniccia R, Bandinelli B, Valente S, Giglioli C, Lazzeri C, Gensini GF, Abbate R, Mannini L. Effect of blood hematocrit and erythrocyte deformability on adenosine 5’-diphosphate platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:764-768.
crossref
22. Resmi H, Akhunlar H, Temiz Artmann A, Guner G. In vitro effects of high glucose concentrations on membrane protein oxidation, G-actin and deformability of human erythrocytes. Cell Biochem Funct 2005;23:163-168.
crossref pmid
23. Brown CD, Ghali HS, Zhao Z, Thomas LL, Friedman EA. Association of reduced red blood cell deformability and diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 2005;67:295-300.
crossref pmid
24. Xue S, Lee BK, Shin S. Disaggregating shear stress: the roles of cell deformability and fibrinogen concentration. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2013;55:231-240.
crossref pmid
25. Shin S, Nam JH, Hou JX, Suh JS. A transient, microfluidic approach to the investigation of erythrocyte aggregation: the threshold shear-stress for erythrocyte disaggregation. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2009;42:117-125.
crossref pmid
26. Satoh K. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: emerging player for vascular protection. Circ J 2013;77:1156-1157.
crossref pmid
27. Aroor AR, Sowers JR, Jia G, DeMarco VG. Pleiotropic effects of the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors on the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014;307:H477-H492.
crossref pmid pmc
Fig. 1

Study flow chart. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; MI, myocardial infarction.

dmj-42-155-g001.jpg
Fig. 2

Schema of the measurement of the red blood cell. Elongation index (EI), which was measured at a pressure of 3 Pa, was defined as (L−W)/(L+W) and it was expressed as a percentage. L means the length of the major axis of the cell, and W means the width of the minor axis of the cell. The lower the value of the EI is, the more circular the cell becomes.

dmj-42-155-g002.jpg
Fig. 3

Comparison of erythrocyte functions (A, elongation index, P<0.001; B, critical shear stress, P=0.040) between two groups. AMI, acute myocardial infarction. aAMI group showed lower elongation index (A, 30.44%±1.77% vs. 31.47%±1.48%) and higher critical shear stress (B, 316.13±108.20 mPa vs. 286.80±85.34 mPa) compared to control group.

dmj-42-155-g003.jpg
Fig. 4

Correlation between the renal function and elongation index at 3 Pa (A, r=0.375, P<0.001; black square, acute myocardial infarction [AMI] group; empty square, non-AMI group) and critical shear stress (B, r=−0.317, P<0.001). GFR, glomerular filtration rate.

dmj-42-155-g004.jpg
Fig. 5

Correlation between the elongation index at 3 Pa and critical shear stress (r=−0.124, P=0.090; black square, acute myocardial infarction [AMI] group; empty square, non-AMI group).

dmj-42-155-g005.jpg
Fig. 6

Correlation between glycosylated hemoglobin and the elongation index at 3 Pa (r=−0.161, P=0.029; black square, acute myocardial infarction [AMI] group; empty square, non-AMI group).

dmj-42-155-g006.jpg
Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

AMI, acute myocardial infarction; BMI, body mass index; LV, left ventricle; RWMI, regional wall motion index.

Characteristic AMI− (n=118) AMI+ (n=77) P value
Male sex 64 (54.2) 47 (64.4) 0.167
Age, yr 63.28±8.88 65.47±9.15 0.098
BMI, kg/m2 24.33±2.85 23.55±3.04 0.071
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 130.12±14.13 133.22±27.93 0.369
Current smoker 21 (17.8) 14 (19.2) 0.810
Hypertension 70 (59.3) 35 (47.9) 0.125
Cerebrovascular accident 8 (6.8) 5 (6.8) 0.985
LV ejection fraction 64.00±4.33 47.68±10.21 <0.001
E/E′; ratio 12.48±3.96 14.01±6.49 0.173
RWMI 1.00±0.01 1.41±0.32 <0.001
Table 2

Laboratory findings

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

AMI, acute myocardial infarction; WBC, white blood cell; RDW, red cell distribution width; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HOMA-β, homeostatic model assessment of β-cell; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance.

Variable AMI− (n=118) AMI+ (n=77) P value
WBC count, K/µL 7.38±2.77 10.68±3.57 <0.001
Hemoglobin, g/dL 13.53±1.81 13.11±2.15 0.164
RDW, % 13.15±0.87 13.75±1.30 <0.001
MCV, fL 90.36±3.73 90.70±3.75 0.551
MCHC, g/dL 33.95±1.03 34.14±0.83 0.180
Platelet count, K/µL 253.52±80.07 225.12±66.36 0.011
ESR, mm/hr 27.48±32.03 23.31±19.16 0.454
hs-CRP, mg/dL 1.81±3.42 3.15±4.25 0.071
Creatinine, mg/dL 1.07±0.34 1.85±1.78 0.001
Estimated GFR, mL/min 73.62±17.30 54.16±22.63 <0.001
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 184.35±42.30 188.61±50.90 0.536
Triglyceride, mg/dL 160.46±108.61 171.29±109.82 0.512
HDL, mg/dL 50.38±14.48 42.17±13.45 <0.001
LDL, mg/dL (estimated) 101.99±34.78 112.18±45.16 0.106
Cystatin C, mg/dL 0.84±0.28 1.19±1.05 0.024
Uric acid, mg/dL 5.06±1.81 5.76±1.62 0.029
Total protein, mg/dL 7.27±0.66 6.44±0.68 <0.001
Total bilirubin, mg/dL 0.78±0.26 0.90±0.33 0.006
AST, IU/L 26.83±13.90 39.04±27.77 <0.001
ALT, IU/L 27.03±18.19 26.59±14.45 0.858
Fasting glucose, mg/dL 164.40±53.39 155.61±48.67 0.362
Fasting insulin, µU/mL 12.75±23.18 14.32±17.96 0.713
Fasting C-peptide, ng/mL 2.90±3.12 3.33±2.13 0.366
Glycosylated hemoglobin, % 7.89±1.76 7.82±1.61 0.781
HOMA-β 53.71±106.75 66.29±57.36 0.476
HOMA-IR 3.80±2.17 6.19±11.22 0.189
Table 3

The association between critical shear stress and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on multiple linear regression

Adjusted for sex, age, hypertension, history of cerebrovascular accident, smoking, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, pharmacologic status (nicorandil, insulin, metformin, aspirin, adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker, renin-angiotensin system blockade, β-blocker, calcium channel blocker, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors), left ventricular ejection fraction, E/E′ ratio, white blood cell, hemoglobin, red cell distribution width, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, total protein, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, estimated glomerular filtration rate, glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, cystatin C, homeostasis model assessment β-cell, and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance.

Variable R2 Estimated β Standard error P value
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate 0.497 3.644 0.734 <0.001
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors 0.574 −64.215 30.872 0.048


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
101-2104, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea​
Tel: +82-2-714-9064    Fax: +82-2-714-9084    E-mail: diabetes@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2021 by Korean Diabetes Association. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer