INTRODUCTION

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a standard monitoring test for long-term glycemic control. Although a shift from glucose-based diagnosis to a HbA1c-based diagnosis may still be debated across ethnic groups [1], HbA1c has been recently recommended as one diagnostic criteria for diabetes. In Korea, HbA1c was recommended as a diagnostic criterion for diabetes in clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes in 2011 [2]. Using the HbA1c levels than using the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels has several advantages in the diagnosis of diabetes, such as greater convenience and less day-to-day perturbations during stressful conditions [3]. However, these advantages must be balanced by the incomplete correlation between HbA1c and the average glucose in some clinical conditions, such as anemia, renal insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, and cancers [45]. Several studies have been performed to predict prediabetes and diabetes in nondiabetic Korean participants, using oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-based and HbA1c-based diagnostic criteria [678]. A recent epidemiological study using the data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) has been reported [9], but this study did not exclude those conditions influencing the HbA1c levels. Using data from the 2011 KNHANES, we estimated the threshold level of HbA1c for the FPG of 100 and 126 mg/dL, traditional fasting glucose-based diagnostic criteria in the Korean adult population.

METHODS

The KNHANES, conducted periodically by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) and initiated in 1998, was designed to provide comprehensive information on Koreans' health status, health behavior, and nutritional status [10]. Data from the second-year (2011) KNHANES V, including HbA1c, and fasting blood glucose, were used in this cross-sectional analysis. All laboratory data monitor laboratory performance by quality control programs to ensure that all analytical values meet acceptable standards of precision and accuracy [10].

From an initial total of 8,518 participants, 6,066 persons (2,677 men and 3,389 women) with HbA1c and fasting glucose data and who were not taking diabetic medications, were evaluated. From 6,066 persons, 1,585 were excluded for the following reasons: 82 persons had a lack of underlying disease information; 707 persons were below 18 years old; fasting time was not over 10 hours in 262 persons; 366 persons had anemia, which was defined as a hemoglobin value <130 g/L in men (n=67) and <120 g/L in women (n=299); eight persons were pregnant; the estimated glomerular filtration ratio, using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation of 14 persons, was less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m²; nine persons had liver cirrhosis; and 137 persons had any type of cancer. A total of 4,481 persons were used in this analysis. All examination (or testing) protocols were approved by the KCDC Institutional Review Board, with each subject providing written informed consent before participating and the Institutional Review Board of Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital reviewed and approved the study protocol. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for HbA1c were plotted, and statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study participants included 1,992 men and 2,489 women. The mean age was 48.63±16.3 years, and 55.5% were women. Their mean body mass index was 23.6±3.4 kg/m², and waist circumference was 81.2±10.1 cm. The fasting blood glucose was 93.9±14.4 mg/dL, and HbA1c was 5.6%±0.5%. Other metabolic parameters were as follows: systolic blood pressure was 118.2±17.0 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure was 75.8±10.4 mm Hg; total cholesterol was 192±36 mg/dL; triglyceride level was 131±106 mg/dL; and low density lipoprotein cholesterol was 115±33 mg/dL.

Fig. 1 shows the ROC curve for HbA1c predicting prediabetes and diabetes among individuals without diabetic medications. A HbA1c cutoff of 6.35% was the optimal threshold for the FPG of 126 mg/dL, with 86.9% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity (area under the curve, 0.977; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.966 to 0.988; P<0.001). A HbA1c cutoff of 6.5% produced a sensitivity of 68.8% and a specificity of 100% for a FPG of 126 mg/dL (Fig. 1A). A HbA1c cutoff of 5.65% was shown to be the optimal threshold for a FPG of 100 mg/dL, with 69.3% sensitivity and 71% specificity (area under the curve, 0.760; 95% CI, 0.741 to 0.780; P<0.001). A HbA1c cut-off of 5.7% produced a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 80.7% for a FPG of 100 mg/dL (Fig. 1B).

DISCUSSION

Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease characterized by the development or worsening of multiple chronic complications [11]. Therefore, it is important to prevent diabetes-associated complications through the early diagnosis and prevention of diabetes. This study suggests that FPG is accurately measured for the screening or diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes because the established FPG criterion for the diagnosis of hyperglycemic states is still valid. However, the measurement of FPG is subject to some limitations. Patients for screening of diabetes must fast ≥8 hours, and many laboratories, including the Korean National Health Insurance Corp., measure the serum glucose [12], even though their guidelines recommend plasma. Therefore, we included HbA1c as a diagnostic criterion for prediabetes and diabetes in Korea. The Korean Diabetes Association suggests that FPG and HbA1c tests are equally reliable methods for detecting prediabetes or diabetes [2].

Several studies have been performed to examine the threshold for HbA1c for the prediction of prediabetes and diabetes in nondiabetic Korean participants [678]. Kim et al. [6] reported that the optimal cutoff points for HbA1c and FPG for the diagnosis of diabetes in 392 subjects with risk factors for diabetes were 6.1% (sensitivity 81.8%, specificity 84.9%) and 110 mg/dL (sensitivity 85.2%, specificity 88.5%), respectively. One hospital-based study, using data from 405 subjects without known diabetes and who underwent OGTT and HbA1c tests for the diagnosis of diabetes, showed that the HbA1c threshold of 6.1% optimally identified diabetes (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 71.7%) [7]. Lee et al. [8] analyzed 4,616 subjects without diabetes and reported an optimal point of 6.1% HbA1c to diagnose diabetes, with a sensitivity of 63.8% and specificity of 88.1% and a HbA1c cutoff of 5.7% for the identification of prediabetes (sensitivity 48.6%, specificity 65.7%). These hospital-based or community-based studies showed that the HbA1c threshold is lower than the American Dental Association (ADA) criterion.

In the recent epidemiological study based on the 2011 KNHANES, a HbA1c threshold of 6.1% and 6.5% produced sensitivities of 85.2% and 67.7% and specificities of 90.5% and 98.0% for a FPG of 126 mg/dL, respectively [9]. These findings were similar to those reported previously in several Korean cohort studies. Based on the high specificity of a HbA1c cutoff of 6.5%, Kim et al. [9] reported that the current diagnostic criteria of HbA1c ≥6.5% might be acceptable in the Korean adult population. However, our data in the 2011 KNHANES that excluded these conditions to influence the interpretation of HbA1c levels, such as anemia, renal insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, and cancers, demonstrated that the HbA1c cutoff points for the diagnosis of diabetes were 6.35% with a sensitivity and specificity of 86.9% and 99.1%, respectively. Our findings showed that the HbA1c level for the diagnosis of diabetes in Korea might be lower than the ADA criterion, although the HbA1c level was slightly higher than the results in the previous community- or hospital-based and national representative studies of the Korean adult population [11].

The epidemiological data showed a strong correlation between HbA1c and the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR), as seen with the FPG and 2-hour plasma glucose (PG) levels, as well as other microvascular complications of diabetes [131415]. However, few representative population-based data sets are available regarding the glycemic and HbA1c thresholds for detecting DR in Asia. A recent study using data from the 2011 KNHANES showed that the overall glycemic thresholds for DR were 113.4 mg/dL for FPG and 6.2% for HbA1c. The sensitivities and specificities were 82.6% and 91.2% for FPG and 93.9% and 89.7% for HbA1c, respectively [16]. The optimal thresholds did not differ by age group. Although the KNHANES was based on cross-sectional data, this report was the first population-based nationwide study for the associations of FPG and HbA1c with DR in a Korean population, and it was suggested that the current diabetes diagnostic values for FPG and HbA1c based on DR may be lower for the Korean population, similar to the opinion of our study [16].

There are several limitations in this study. First, the KNHANES was based on cross-sectional data. Second, the information for hemoglobinopathy to influence the interpretation of HbA1c levels was not included in this study, even though the prevalence of hemoglobinopathy is low in Korea. Finally, 2-hour PG levels during an OGTT were not included in this analysis, although an OGTT could not be performed in the KNHANES.

In conclusion, this study shows that the measurement of the HbA1c may be efficient in identifying participants without diabetic medications with a HbA1c cutoff of 6.35% being highly specific and sensitive for the diagnosis of diabetes and a HbA1c of 5.65% being a reasonable threshold for prediabetes. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the HbA1c cutoff point for diagnosing prediabetes and diabetes in the Korean population.

NOTES

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES

• 1. Christensen DL, Witte DR, Kaduka L, Jorgensen ME, Borch-Johnsen K, Mohan V, Shaw JE, Tabak AG, Vistisen D. Moving to an A1C-based diagnosis of diabetes has a different impact on prevalence in different ethnic groups. Diabetes Care 2010;33:580-582. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 2. Ko SH, Kim SR, Kim DJ, Oh SJ, Lee HJ, Shim KH, Woo MH, Kim JY, Kim NH, Kim JT, Kim CH, Kim HJ, Jeong IK, Hong EK, Cho JH, Mok JO, Yoon KH. Committee of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Korean Diabetes Association. 2011 Clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes in Korea. Diabetes Metab J 2011;35:431-436. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 3. American Diabetes Association. (2) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38(Suppl):S8-S16.ArticlePMCPDF
• 4. Son JI, Rhee SY, Woo JT, Hwang JK, Chin SO, Chon S, Oh S, Kim SW, Kim YS. Hemoglobin A1c may be an inadequate diagnostic tool for diabetes mellitus in anemic subjects. Diabetes Metab J 2013;37:343-348. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 5. Herman WH, Cohen RM. Racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between HbA1c and blood glucose: implications for the diagnosis of diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:1067-1072. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 6. Kim KS, Kim SK, Lee YK, Park SW, Cho YW. Diagnostic value of glycated haemoglobin HbA(1c) for the early detection of diabetes in high-risk subjects. Diabet Med 2008;25:997-1000. ArticlePubMed
• 7. Lee YS, Moon SS. The use of HbA1c for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in Korea. Korean J Med 2011;80:291-297.
• 8. Lee H, Oh JY, Sung YA, Kim DJ, Kim SH, Kim SG, Moon S, Park IeB, Rhee EJ, Chung CH, Kim BJ, Ku BJ. Optimal hemoglobin A1C cutoff value for diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korean adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013;99:231-236. ArticlePubMed
• 9. Kim JM, Hong JW, Won JC, Noh JH, Ko KS, Rhee BD, Kim DJ. Glycated hemoglobin value for fasting plasma glucose of 126 mg/dL in Korean: the 2011 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Metab J 2014;38:480-483. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 10. Kweon S, Kim Y, Jang MJ, Kim Y, Kim K, Choi S, Chun C, Khang YH, Oh K. Data resource profile: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Int J Epidemiol 2014;43:69-77. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 11. Task Force Team for Basic Statistical Study of Korean Diabetes Mellitus of Korean Diabetes Association, Park IB, Kim J, Kim DJ, Chung CH, Oh JY, Park SW, Lee J, Choi KM, Min KW, Park JH, Son HS, Ahn CW, Kim H, Lee S, Lee IB, Choi I, Baik SH. Diabetes epidemics in Korea: reappraise nationwide survey of diabetes "diabetes in Korea 2007". Diabetes Metab J 2013;37:233-239. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 12. Jee SH, Suh I, Kim IS, Appel LJ. Smoking and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in men with low levels of serum cholesterol: the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation Study. JAMA 1999;282:2149-2155. ArticlePubMed
• 13. McCance DR, Hanson RL, Charles MA, Jacobsson LT, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH, Knowler WC. Comparison of tests for glycated haemoglobin and fasting and two hour plasma glucose concentrations as diagnostic methods for diabetes. BMJ 1994;308:1323-1328. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 14. Sabanayagam C, Liew G, Tai ES, Shankar A, Lim SC, Subramaniam T, Wong TY. Relationship between glycated haemoglobin and microvascular complications: is there a natural cut-off point for the diagnosis of diabetes? Diabetologia 2009;52:1279-1289. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 15. Colagiuri S, Lee CM, Wong TY, Balkau B, Shaw JE, Borch-Johnsen K. DETECT-2 Collaboration Writing Group. Glycemic thresholds for diabetes-specific retinopathy: implications for diagnostic criteria for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:145-150. PubMed
• 16. Park YM, Ko SH, Lee JM, Kim DJ, Kim DJ, Han K, Bower JK, Ahn YB. Committee of Clinical Practice Guideline. Korean Diabetes Association. Glycaemic and haemoglobin A1c thresholds for detecting diabetic retinopathy: the fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;104:435-442. ArticlePubMed

Fig. 1

Receiver operating characteristic curves for performance of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose corresponding to diabetes and prediabetes without diabetic medications, defined by the 2015 American Dental Association criteria among the Korean population by glucose levels. (A) Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of 126 mg/dL. (B) FPG of 100 mg/dL.

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• The Cutoff Value of HbA1c in Predicting Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glucose
  Seyoung Kwon, Youngak Na
  The Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science.2017; 49(2): 114.     CrossRef
• Cutoff Point of HbA1c for Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Individuals
  Bing Wang, Ming-Chuan Liu, Xin-Yu Li, Xu-Han Liu, Qiu-Xia Feng, Lu Lu, Zhu Zhu, Ying-Shu Liu, Wei Zhao, Zheng-Nan Gao, Noel Christopher Barengo
  PLOS ONE.2016; 11(11): e0166597.     CrossRef

About this article

Hong S, Kang JG, Kim CS, Lee SJ, Park CY, Lee CB, Ihm SH. Glycosylated Hemoglobin Threshold for Predicting Diabetes and Prediabetes from the Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Metab J. 2016;40(2):167-170.

Received: Jun 19, 2015; Accepted: Sep 18, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2016.40.2.167.

Download citation ↓