Diabetes Metab J > Epub ahead of print
Kang, Park, Kwon, Chung, Namkung, Han, and Ko: Reproductive Life Span and Severe Hypoglycemia Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus



Estrogen promotes glucose homeostasis, enhances insulin sensitivity, and maintains counter regulatory responses in recurrent hypoglycemia in women of reproductive age. Postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) might be more vulnerable to severe hypoglycemia (SH) events. However, the relationship between reproductive factors and SH occurrence in T2DM remains unelucidated.


This study included data on 181,263 women with postmenopausal T2DM who participated in a national health screening program from January 1 to December 31, 2009, obtained using the Korean National Health Insurance System database. Outcome data were obtained until December 31, 2018. Associations between reproductive factors and SH incidence were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.


During the mean follow-up of 7.9 years, 11,279 (6.22%) postmenopausal women with T2DM experienced SH episodes. A longer reproductive life span (RLS) (≥40 years) was associated with a lower SH risk compared to a shorter RLS (<30 years) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.80; P for trend <0.001) after multivariable adjustment. SH risk decreased with every 5-year increment of RLS (with <30 years as a reference [adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.95; P=0.0001 for 30-34 years], [adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.84; P<0.001 for 35-39 years], [adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.81; P<0.001 for ≥40 years]). The use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was associated with a lower SH risk than HRT nonuse.


Extended exposure to endogenous ovarian hormone during lifetime may decrease the number of SH events in women with T2DM after menopause.


Reproductive life span (RLS), which is the time period between menarche and menopause, reflects the total period of life in which a woman is exposed to sex hormones. Unlike progesterone, the endogenous ovarian hormone estrogen has protective roles in female bone health, cardiovascular protection, and metabolic homeostasis [1,2]. Therefore, RLS represents not only the years during which women can conceive, but also the period in which women benefit from estrogen exposure. RLS has been related to decreased morbidity, decreased mortality, and cardioprotection [3,4].
Severe hypoglycemia (SH), a hypoglycemic episode requiring the assistance of another person to administer treatment [5], is a troublesome and serious complication in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [6]. Patients with long-term T2DM who experience recurrent hypoglycemia with insulin or sulfonylurea treatment usually exhibit blunted or impaired counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia and have an increased risk of SH [5]. Although the incidence rate of SH is low in T2DM [7], its occurrence can be fatal due to the risk of loss of consciousness, falls, seizures, motor vehicle accidents, coma, and death [8]. Therefore, the identification of risk factors and establishment of preventive strategies for SH in patents with T2DM are urgently required.
The effect of endogenous ovarian hormone on glucose metabolism or insulin action in women with T2DM has not been fully elucidated. Estrogen promotes glucose homeostasis, enhances insulin sensitivity [9], and maintains corticosterone secretory responses in recurrent hypoglycemia [10]. Thus, the beneficial effect of estrogen on glucose or insulin, or its counterregulatory action in women of reproductive age might disappear after menopause in women with T2DM. Moreover, postmenopausal women with T2DM who are at high risk for SH might be more vulnerable to SH events [11,12]. However, the relationship between RLS and SH occurrence in T2DM has not been investigated.
Thus, we aimed to clarify the association between RLS and SH in T2DM and the potential effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the occurrence of SH in postmenopausal T2DM using a National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) claim database.


Data source and study setting

In this study, we used a single-insurer system managed by the government, the Korean NHIS claim database, which provides mandatory comprehensive medical care to 97% of the Korean population and medical aid to 3% of the population with the lowest incomes [13]. The NHIS also provides free biennial national health screenings to all Korean individuals aged ≥40 years and all employees regardless of age, as well as annual health screenings for physical laborers. In addition, the NHIS maintains the National Cancer Screening Program, which includes biennial screening for breast and cervical cancers in every woman aged ≥40 and ≥20 years, respectively. The screening program for breast and cervical cancers includes a self-administered questionnaire about reproductive factors such as parity, duration of breastfeeding, age at menarche, age at menopause, whether the participant had undergone hysterectomy, history of HRT use and its duration, and history of oral contraceptive (OC) use and its duration. All participants were asked to answer and submit the self-administered questionnaire on the day of examination.
Based on an approximate participation rate of 70% [14], the NHIS maintains an extensive health information database that consists of a qualification database (e.g., age, sex, income, region, and type of eligibility), a claim database including diagnosis statements defined by the International Classification of Disease 10th revision (ICD-10), prescription statements, a health check-up database, and death information [15].

Study population

Among the 3,109,506 women aged ≥40 years who simultaneously underwent both health and breast and cervical cancer screening from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, we identified 1,725,502 postmenopausal women and excluded those who reported having a hysterectomy because most did not know whether they also had oophorectomy. We also excluded 326,950 women with missing information about whether they used HRT or OCs.
Of 1,398,552 postmenopausal women, 187,617 women were classified as having T2DM (1) if they had at least one claim with a diagnosis of diabetes based on ICD-10 (E11-14) and were prescribed at least one antidiabetic drug at any time over a 1 year period, or (2) if they were newly diagnosed with diabetes showing a fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL during a health examination [15].
After excluding those who had experienced SH episodes according to ICD-10 codes prior to the health examination date, 181,263 eligible postmenopausal women with diabetes aged ≥40 were enrolled as the study population (Fig. 1). The cohort was followed up from baseline to the date of SH episode or time of death or until the end of the study period (December 31, 2018), whichever came first. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Catholic Medical Center (VC19ZESI0004). The review board waived written informed consent because the data were public and anonymized under confidentiality guidelines.

Exposure: reproductive factors

The ages at menarche in the Korean population were categorized into ≤12, 13-14, 15-16, and ≥17 years groups. Menopause was defined as having 12 months of consecutive amenorrhea without apparent cause, such as pregnancy or lactation [16], while the age at menopause was categorized into <40, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, and ≥55 years. Early menopause was defined as menopause before the age of 45 years.
The RLS, which reflects endogenous estrogen exposure during an individual’s entire life, was estimated by the total reproductive period, which was defined as the age at menarche subtracted from the age of menopause and categorized as <30, 30-34, 35-39, or ≥40 years. A shorter period of total reproductive years was defined as ≤30 years.
Parity was categorized as never, 1, or ≥2 children. Total lifetime breastfeeding history was categorized as never, <6, 6-11, and ≥12 months. The duration of HRT was categorized as never, <2, 2-5, or ≥5 years. The duration of OC use was categorized as never, <1, or ≥1 year.

Study outcome: SH case ascertainment

The primary outcome was newly diagnosed SH during the follow-up period. According to ICD-10 based diagnostic clinical codes for SH [17-20], postmenopausal women with T2DM who had any claims for E1163−, E1463-, E160-, E161-, and E162-from inpatient, outpatient, or emergency room since the date of the health examination were classified as having experienced SH episodes. Only the first SH episodes within the observation period were included.


Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the patient’s weight in kilograms divided by square of the patient’s height in meters. Information on each individual’s lifestyle was obtained from the National Cancer Screening Program self-questionnaire. Smoking status was classified into non-, ex-, and current smokers. Individuals who consumed at least 30 g of alcohol per day were defined as heavy alcohol consumers [21]. Regular exercise was defined as performing >30 minutes of moderate physical activity at least five times per week or >20 minutes of strenuous physical activity at least three times per week [17]. Comorbidities including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cancer were based on ICD-10 codes from past medical history [22]. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. An estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was considered indicative of chronic kidney disease. The use of insulin, the use of insulin secretagogues such as sulfonylureas and glinides, and the simultaneous use of three or more oral hypoglycemic agents for glycemic control were defined using claims data. Blood samples for the measurement of serum fasting glucose and lipid levels were drawn after an overnight fast. The hospitals where these health examinations were performed were certified by the NHIS and subjected to regular quality control [13].

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean±standard deviation, and categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Incidence rates of SH were expressed as the number of events per 1,000 person-years. Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between various reproductive factors and the incidence of SH. Proportional hazards assumptions were evaluated using Schoenfeld residuals with the logarithm of the cumulative hazards function based on Kaplan-Meier estimates for reproductive factors. We did not detect any significant departures from proportionality in hazards over time.
Potential confounders or effect modifiers were identified a priori based on literature review and presumed causal relationships among the covariates. Model 1 was non-adjusted, whereas Model 2 was adjusted for age at menarche, age at menopause, number of parities, duration of breastfeeding, duration of HRT, duration of OC use, alcohol consumption, smoking, regular exercise, income, BMI, hypertension, dyslipidemia, use of three or more oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin treatment, and use of insulin secretagogues such as sulfonylureas and glinides. Model 3 was adjusted for RLS. Tests for linear trend across categories of reproductive factors were performed by modeling an ordinal variable for each category of reproductive factors. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).


Baseline characteristics

During the mean follow-up of 7.9±1.7 years, 11,279 of 181,263 postmenopausal women with diabetes had a newly identified SH event, corresponding to an incidence rate of 7.9 per 1,000 person-years. The baseline characteristics of the study population according to SH incidence are shown in Table 1. Compared with the patients without SH events, patients with SH events were older (64.33±7.83 years vs. 68.89±7.24 years), had a lower BMI (25.23±3.39 kg/m2 vs. 24.99±3.52 kg/m2), had a higher systolic blood pressure (129.88±16.32 mm Hg vs. 131.41± 16.99 mm Hg), participated in fewer regular physical activities (18.68% vs. 13.57%), were more often on insulin treatment (11.46% vs. 25.90%), were more often on treatment with insulin secretagogues such as sulfonylureas (81.26% vs. 61.19%) and glinides (6.04% vs. 3.63%), had been taking three or more oral hypoglycemic agents (24.32% vs. 42.11%), had more comorbidities such as hypertension (69.90% vs. 81.16%) and chronic kidney disease (17.68% vs. 32.31%), had a more frequent past history of stroke (4.20% vs. 2.55%), heart disease (10.67% vs. 7.45%), and cardiovascular disease (14.24% vs. 9.63%) in analysis, except for those who did not respond, had a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (79.73±28.68 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 71.80±25.82 mL/min/1.73 m2), higher fasting blood glucose level (137.96±43.13 mg/dL vs. 141.86±56.47 mg/dL), lower cholesterol level (202.74±49.14 mg/dL vs. 200.50±55.46 mg/dL), and lower low-density lipoprotein level (119.18±80.25 mg/dL vs. 115.45±109.06 mg/dL) (P<0.0001 for all).
With regard to reproductive factors, differences were observed between the two groups. Compared with the patients without SH events, those with SH events showed a later mean age at menarche (16.58±1.82 years vs. 16.82±1.77 years), and an earlier mean age at menopause (50.09±4.32 years vs. 49.45± 4.61 years), resulting in a shorter mean RLS (33.51±4.71 years vs. 32.63±4.98 years) (P<0.0001 for all). The proportion of HRT use was higher in patients without SH events than in patients with SH events (12.26% vs. 7.00%) (Table 1).

Risk of SH events according to reproductive factors

Menstrual history

A longer RLS of 40 ≥years was associated with a lower risk of SH events (adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.81; P for trend <0.001) than a short RLS of <30 years after adjusting for age, BMI, hypertension, dyslipidemia, fasting glucose level, current smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, use of insulin or insulin secretagogues such as sulfonylureas and glinides, multiple oral hypoglycemic agent use, chronic kidney disease, HRT, and OC use (Table 2). The inverse association between longer RLS and risk of SH event was more evident in younger women (aged <65 years) than in older women (aged ≥65 years) (P for interaction=0.0032; P for trend=0.0005) (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 1). In addition, patients aged ≥55 years at menopause had a lower risk of SH events than those aged <40 years at menopause (adjusted HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.83; P for trend <0.001) after multivariable adjustment (Table 2). The incidence rate of SH and its adjusted HR tended to decrease with increasing RLS (P for trend <0.0001) (Fig. 2). The cumulative incidence of SH for up to 8 years according to reproductive factors is shown using Kaplan-Meier curves (Fig. 3). The cumulative incidence of SH events increases with increasing years of age at menarche and decreasing years of age at menopause and RLS (all log-rank P<0.0001).

Parity and breast feeding

No difference in risk of SH events was observed in the parity groups. Breastfeeding had no effect on the risk of SH events (Table 2).

HRT and oral contraceptive use

Exogenous sex hormone exposure showed variable results; patients of all HRT groups were at lower risk of SH events than were those without HRT after adjustment for multiple variables (adjusted HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.83 for the HRT <2 years group; P<0.0001) (adjusted HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92 for the HRT 2 to 4 years group; P=0.0006) (adjusted HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.92 for the HRT ≥5 years group; P=0.0006), whereas OC use had no effect on the risk of SH events (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.01 for OC users <1 year; P=0.151) (adjusted HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.10 for OC users ≥1 year; P=0.503) (Table 2).


In this nationwide population-based cohort study of postmenopausal women with T2DM, a longer RLS showed an inverse association with SH risk after adjustment for potential confounding factors, including the use of HRT and OCs. The inverse association with SH risk was stronger in younger women (aged <65 years) than in older women (aged ≥65 years), which was verified as a risk factor for SH [23]. These results suggest that extended exposure to endogenous ovarian hormones during the lifetime may be a protective factor against SH events in women with T2DM after menopause. HRT was also inversely associated with a lower risk of SH events in this population, whereas there was no association between OC use and the risk of SH events.
SH is uncommon early in the disease, as the human body physiologically defends against glucagon and adrenaline release and autonomic symptoms drive patients to consume carbohydrates against a further decrease in blood glucose when hypoglycemia occurs. However, these counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia and the awareness of hypoglycemia are impaired due to increasing durations of diabetes and repetitive hypoglycemic episodes. Consequently, glucagon release is gradually reduced, and sympatho-adrenal responses are activated at lower levels of glucose, increasing the risk of SH [5].
SH was reported to occur every year in 0.1/100 patients with dietary intervention, 0.4 to 0.6/100 patients with sulfonylurea treatment, and 2.3/100 patients with insulin treatment in a randomized controlled trial [24]. More recently, the prevalence of SH was 1.02% to 3.04% in a large cohort study with non-insulin-dependent subjects with T2DM [25]. SH is associated with multiple negative influences [26], and several studies suggest that hypoglycemia is correlated with cardiovascular disease and mortality in T2DM [27,28]. Because of the severity, the prediction and prevention of SH are important for glycemic control in patients with diabetes [6,23].
Regarding counterregulatory action against hypoglycemia, reported were reduced responses of the sympathetic nervous system, growth hormone, and endogenous glucose production in women compared to men with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) [29]. However, hypoglycemia is prevalent in patients with T1DM regardless of sex [30]. Estrogen has been suggested as a main factor explaining why women with T1DM do not have an increased prevalence of hypoglycemia despite reduced counterregulatory responses [31]. Similar to the observation in T1DM, studies report more blunted counterregulatory actions against hypoglycemia and reduced risk of developing SH in women than in men despite similar glycemic thresholds between the sexes [32]. The responses to hypoglycemia in postmenopausal women with T2DM who were not receiving HRT were comparable to men of the same age with T2DM [33].
Estradiol has been revealed to stimulate hypoglycemia-associated hyperglucagonemia and hypercorticosteronemia in animal studies [10]. Consistent with this finding, another study reported that ovariectomized animals exhibit significantly reduced basal and stress-associated plasma corticosterone levels [34]. Estradiol provides neuroprotection against bioenergetic insults and controls hindbrain metabolic sensor screening and signaling of hypoglycemia-associated neuroenergetic instability [32]. Male rats exposed to recurrent insulin-induced hypoglycemia exhibit diminished Fos immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus [35], yet ovariectomized rats implanted with estradiol, but not oil, exhibit consistent patterns of Fos labeling in the hypothalamus after acute versus repeated hypoglycemia [36]. These results suggest that estradiol sustains or enhances neuronal reactivity to recurring hypoglycemia in the central metabolic structure, supporting the results of the current study showing that extended exposure to endogenous ovarian hormones during the lifetime is a protective factor against SH events in women with T2DM after menopause.
The beneficial effects of HRT on glucose homeostasis have been reported in several studies. Homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance and abdominal fat were decreased by 13%, and the incidence of T2DM was decreased by 30% with HRT in a meta-analysis of 107 trials evaluating HRT effects on women without T2DM [37]. In women with T2DM, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance was further decreased by 36%, and fasting glucose was decreased with HRT [37], although these effects of HRT against T2DM do not last after therapy discontinuation [38].
Estrogen, known to have insulin-sensitizing properties and to be protective for pancreatic beta cells [39], has beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis in HRT by affecting insulin-mediated glucose uptake, insulin signaling, and glucose transport in adipose tissue and muscle [9]. Estrogen also increases the number of insulin receptors and specific insulin binding in a tissue-specific and dose-dependent manner [9]. Animal studies suggest multiple mechanisms by which estradiol may improve insulin-mediated glucose uptake [9]. Progestogens, in contrast, have been associated with insulin resistance. The properties of insulin resistance are different among the progestogens. Progestogens with androgen or glucocorticoid activities such as levonorgestrel or medroxyprogesterone acetate have insulin resistance and may blunt the beneficial effect of estrogen on insulin resistance [40]. Conversely, nonandrogenic progestogens such as norethindrone acetate and dydrogesterone show neutral effects on glucose homeostasis and do not blunt estrogen action on insulin resistance [40]. Therefore, whether HRT increases insulin sensitivity or resistance seems to be decided according to the type of progestogen added and the dose of estrogen.
The effect of HRT on glycemic control seems to depend on the timing of treatment relative to menopause. As suggested for cardiovascular health outcomes [41], a timing hypothesis regarding HRT was suggested for the insulin-mediated glucose disposal rate based on the findings that the insulin-mediated glucose disposal rate was improved with estradiol treatment in early postmenopausal women within 6 years since time of menopause, whereas it was worsened with estradiol treatment in late postmenopausal women ≥10 years after time of menopause [42]. Although the mechanisms for different estrogen effects on glucoregulatory insulin action according to time since menopause is not clearly determined, it is suggested that increasing duration of estrogen deficiency may lead to changes in estrogen receptor (ER) expression [42]. ER alpha (ERα) and beta (ERβ), to which estrogen binds with equal affinity, are two isoforms of ERs. The relative expression of each receptor varies in each tissue and changes with the duration of estrogen deficiency [43]. Furthermore, estrogen binding to ERα seems to be beneficial to glucose homeostasis, whereas estrogen binding to ERβ seems to be harmful [44]. Therefore, the composition of ERα and ERβ in glucoregulatory tissues may determine the effect of estrogen action on whole-body glucose disposal [9].
Differences among the effects of different HRT regimens on diabetes have not been clearly identified, and differences in HRT effects on diabetes according to HRT initiation timing or duration have not been established. Data on the effect of HRT on the counterregulatory action against hypoglycemia are lacking; however, the results of investigations on the effect of HRT on menopausal women with diabetes suggest that HRT has a favorable effect rather than a harmful influence on glycemic control in women with T2DM [42,45,46]. Furthermore, the findings of an experimental study in which ovariectomized female rats with estradiol implants showed consistent neuronal reactivity to repeated hypoglycemia [36] suggest a potential mechanism by which HRT positively influences postmenopausal women with diabetes.
This study has several limitations. First, reproductive factors were reliant on self-reported recall. Age at menarche was shown to be recalled with high reproducibility [47], and age at menopause was also reproducible but more discrepant with increasing time since menopause [48]. Second, although women who experienced surgical menopause were not excluded from the study population, this type of menopause was not assessed because it was infeasible to identify all women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with the limited period of claims data. This limitation was partially overcome by excluding women with a reported history of any type of hysterectomy. Third, because of the limited information with claims data and self-reported questionnaires, glycemic control status such as glycated hemoglobin or duration of diabetes of study participants was not reflected in analyzing SH risk. Fourth, the end points were defined based on the claims data. The precision is not guaranteed to be 100%; however, the methodology using claims data has been demonstrated in previous studies. Fifth, further research is needed on the stronger inverse association of SH risk with RLS in younger women aged <65 years, because there were overlaps of CI between subgroup aged <65 years and aged ≥65 years in RLS 30 to 34 and RLS ≥40 respectively, though these results were significant (P for interaction=0.0032, P for trend=0.0005). Sixth, clarification of the effects of HRT on the risk of SH was not possible because the regimen and timing of HRT were not provided as primary data. However, though various HRT regimens with more individualized approaches for postmenopausal women emerged after the Women’s Health Initiative trial [49-52], estrogen plus progestogen treatment remain a general regimen for postmenopausal women with a uterus when the present’s study populations and their contemporaries were being treated with HRT [49,53,54]. Finally, this study showed only the results of individuals of Asian ethnicity.
Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first report to assess the association between RLS and the risk of SH events in postmenopausal women with T2DM. We evaluated each reproductive factor and history of exogenous hormone treatment. Early menopause and premature menopause, which are related to shorter RLSs, were also identified as risk factors, whereas HRT was identified as a protective factor against SH events in postmenopausal women with T2DM.
In conclusion, a longer RLS, which meant a longer lifetime exposure to endogenous sex hormones, was inversely associated with risk of SH in postmenopausal women with T2DM. HRT was also related to a reduced risk of SH events in this population. Perimenopausal women with T2DM with vasomotor symptoms could benefit from HRT as it improves vasomotor symptoms and reduces the potential high risk of future occurrence of SH. Due to the risk of thromboembolism, a major vascular adverse effect of long-term HRT, further studies are needed for patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease. Identifying a possible SH-preventing mechanism of HRT and confirming the risk of SH events according to different regimens, timing, and duration of HRT would be challenges for future research.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary materials related to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0135.



No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


Conception or design: K.H., S.H.K.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: S.K., Y.M.P., K.H., S.H.K.

Drafting the work or revising: S.K., D.J.K., Y.J.C., J.N., K.H.

Final approval of the manuscript: S.K., Y.M.P., D.J.K., Y.J.C,, J.N., K.H., S.H.K.


This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Number: HI18C0275).



Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study population. HRT, hormone replacement therapy; SH, severe hypoglycemia.
Fig. 2
Trend in risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH) event and reproductive life span (RLS). The incidence rate of SH and its adjusted hazard ratio (HR) tended to decrease with increasing RLS (P for trend <0.0001). IR, incidence rate.
Fig. 3
Cumulative incidence of severe hypoglycemia event in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus according to reproductive factors. The cumulative incidence of outcomes according to reproductive factors (A, age at menarche; B, age at menopause; C, reproductive life span) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the log-rank test was performed to analyze differences amongst the groups.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of study subjects
Characteristic Total participants Severe hypoglycemia event P value

No Yes
Number 181,263 169,984 11,279

Age, yr 64.61±7.87 64.33±7.83 68.89±7.24 <0.0001

Duration of follow-up, yr 7.87±1.72 8.11±1.36 4.31±2.44 <0.0001

Income, quartile <0.0001
 Medical aid+Q1 38,971 (21.50) 36,649 (21.56) 2,322 (20.59)
 Q2 32,807 (18.10) 30,803 (18.12) 2,004 (17.77)
 Q3 46,000 (25.38) 43,250 (25.44) 2,750 (24.38)
 Q4 63,485 (35.02) 59,282 (34.88) 4,203 (37.26)

Smoking status 0.0100
 Never 173,787 (95.88) 163,035 (95.91) 10,752 (95.33)
 Ex-smoker 2,079 (1.15) 1,930 (1.14) 149 (1.32)
 Current smoker 5,397 (2.98) 5,019 (2.95) 378 (3.35)

Alcohol consumption <0.0001
 None 165,468 (91.29) 154,890 (91.12) 10,578 (93.78)
 Mild 15,005 (8.28) 14,346 (8.44) 659 (5.84)
 Heavy 790 (0.44) 748 (0.44) 42 (0.37)

Regular exercise (yes) 33,282 (18.36) 31,752 (18.68) 1,530 (13.57) <0.0001

Body mass index, mean, kg/m2 25.21±3.4 25.23±3.39 24.99±3.52 <0.0001
 <18.5 2,177 (1.20) 1,953 (1.15) 224 (1.99) <0.0001
 18.5-<23 43,796 (24.16) 40,803 (24.00) 2,993 (26.54) <0.0001
 23-<25 44,587 (24.6) 41,880 (24.64) 2,707 (24.00) <0.0001
 25-<30 75,280 (41.53) 70,846 (41.68) 4,434 (39.31) <0.0001
 ≥30 15,423 (8.51) 14,502 (8.53) 921 (8.17) <0.0001

Blood pressure, mm Hg
 Systolic 129.97±16.37 129.88±16.32 131.41±16.99 <0.0001
 Diastolic 78.09±10.18 78.09±10.17 78.11±10.39 0.8358

Estimated glomerular filtration rate, mL/min/1.73 m2 79.23±28.58 79.73±28.68 71.80±25.82 <0.0001

Fasting glucose, mg/dL 138.2±44.08 137.96±43.13 141.86±56.47 <0.0001

Total cholesterol, mg/dL 202.6±49.56 202.74±49.14 200.50±55.46 <0.0001

High density lipoprotein, mg/dL 54.86±39.2 54.90±39.34 54.25±37.05 0.0911

Low density lipoprotein, mg/dL 118.95±82.35 119.18±80.25 115.45±109.06 <0.0001

 Hypertension 127,977 (70.6) 118,823 (69.90) 9,154 (81.16) <0.0001
 Dyslipidemia 96,283 (53.12) 90,290 (53.12) 5,993 (53.13) 0.9714
 Chronic kidney disease 33,701(18.59) 30,057 (17.68) 3,644 (32.31) <0.0001

Past history of disease, by questionnaire
 Strokea <0.0001
  No 156,541 (97.34) 146,352 (97.45) 10,189 (95.80)
  Yes 4,271 (2.66) 3,824 (2.55) 447 (4.20)
 Heart diseasea <0.0001
  No 148,550 (92.34) 139,047 (92.55) 9,503 (89.33)
  Yes 12,330 (7.66) 11,195 (7.45) 1,135 (10.67)
 Cardiovascular diseasea <0.0001
  No 144,930 (90.06) 135,804 (90.37) 9,126 (85.76)
  Yes 15,994 (9.94) 14,479 (9.63) 1,515 (14.24)

Insulin treatment 22,409 (12.36) 19,488 (11.46) 2,921(25.90) <0.0001

Insulin secretagogues
 Sulfonylurea 113,176 (62.44) 104,011 (61.19) 9,165 (81.26) <0.0001
 Glinide 6,854 (3.78) 6,173 (3.63) 681 (6.04) <0.0001
 Oral hypoglycemic agents ≥3 46,085(25.42) 41,335 (24.32) 4,750 (42.11) <0.0001

Age at menarche, yr 16.60±1.81 16.58±1.82 16.82±1.77 <0.0001
 ≤12 1,362 (0.75) 1,309 (0.77) 53 (0.47) <0.0001
 13-14 19,330 (10.66) 18,429 (10.84) 901 (7.99) <0.0001
 15-16 67,067 (37.00) 63,182 (37.17) 3,885 (34.44) <0.0001
 ≥17 93,504 (51.58) 87,064 (51.22) 6,440 (57.10) <0.0001

Age at menopause, yr 50.05±4.34 50.09±4.32 49.45±4.61 <0.0001
 <40 3,917 (2.16) 3,562 (2.10) 355 (3.15) <0.0001
 40-44 11,708 (6.46) 10,766 (6.33) 942 (8.35) <0.0001
 45-49 46,523 (25.67) 43,449 (25.56) 3,074 (27.25) <0.0001
 50-54 95,293 (52.57) 89,720 (52.78) 5,573 (49.41) <0.0001
 ≥55 23,822 (13.14) 22,487 (13.23) 1,335 (11.84) <0.0001

Reproductive life span, yr 33.45±4.74 33.51±4.71 32.63±4.98 <0.0001
 <30 28,130 (15.52) 25,838 (15.20) 2,292 (20.32) <0.0001
 30-34 74,110 (40.89) 69,114 (40.66) 4,996 (44.29) <0.0001
 35-39 64,903 (35.81) 61,623 (36.25) 3,280 (29.08) <0.0001
 ≥40 14,120 (7.79) 13,409 (7.89) 711 (6.30) <0.0001

Parity <0.0001
 Nulliparity 3,518 (1.94) 3,355 (1.97) 163 (1.45)
 1 7,915 (4.37) 7,555 (4.44) 360 (3.19)
 ≥2 169,830 (93.69) 159,074 (93.58) 10,756 (95.36)

Duration of breastfeeding, mo <0.0001
 Never 9,079 (5.01) 8,673 (5.10) 406 (3.60)
 <6 7,408 (4.09) 7,123 (4.19) 285 (2.53)
 6-11 24,786 (13.67) 23,514 (13.83) 1,272 (11.28)
 ≥12 139,990 (77.23) 130,674 (76.87) 9,316 (82.6)

Duration of HRT, yr <0.0001
 Never 159,628 (88.06) 149,138 (87.74) 10,490 (93.00)
 <2 12,764 (7.04) 12,310 (7.24) 454 (4.03)
 2-4 4,819 (2.66) 4,645 (2.73) 174 (1.54)
 ≥5 4,052 (2.24) 3,891 (2.29) 161 (1.43)

Duration of OC use, yr <0.0001
 Never 150,657 (83.12) 141,046 (82.98) 9,611 (85.21)
 <1 17,012 (9.39) 16,137 (9.49) 875 (7.76)
 ≥1 13,594 (7.50) 12,801 (7.53) 793 (7.03)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

HRT, hormone replacement therapy; OC, oral contraceptive.

a Data were analyzed except for those who did not respond.

Table 2
HRs and 95% confidence intervals of SH by reproductive factors
Variable No. of subjects No. of SH events Follow-up duration, person-year Incidence rate, /1,000 person-year HR (95% confidence intervals)

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Age at menarche, yr
 ≤12 1,362 53 10,986.6 4.8 0.83 (0.63-1.09) 0.94 (0.71-1.24)
 13-14 19,330 901 154,159.2 5.8 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 15-16 67,067 3,885 529,316.0 7.3 1.26a (1.17-1.35) 1.09b (1.02-1.17)
 ≥17 93,504 6,440 732,587.2 8.8 1.50a (1.40-1.61) 1.15a (1.07-1.23)

Age at menopause, yr
 <40 3,917 355 29,908.9 11.9 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 40-44 11,708 942 90,413.7 10.4 0.88b (0.78-0.99) 0.89b (0.79-1.00)
 45-49 46,523 3,074 365,296.6 8.4 0.71a (0.64-0.79) 0.84b (0.75-0.94)
 50-54 95,293 5,573 752,279.6 7.4 0.62a (0.56-0.70) 0.78a (0.70-0.87)
 ≥55 23,822 1,335 189,150.2 7.1 0.60a (0.53-0.67) 0.73a (0.65-0.83)

Reproductive life span, yr
 <30 28,130 2,292 217,040.3 10.6 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 30-34 74,110 4,996 580,426.7 8.6 0.82a (0.78-0.86) 0.91a (0.86-0.95)
 35-39 64,903 3,280 517,309.5 6.3 0.6a (0.57-0.63) 0.80a (0.76-0.84)
 ≥40 14,120 711 112,272.5 6.3 0.6a (0.55-0.65) 0.74a (0.68-0.81)

 Nulliparity 3,518 163 27,940.8 5.8 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 1 7,915 360 63,267.0 5.7 0.98 (0.81-1.17) 1.05 (0.87-1.27) 1.05 (0.87-1.27)
 ≥2 169,830 10,756 1,335,841.2 8.1 1.38 (1.18-1.61) 1.06 (0.90-1.26) 1.06 (0.90-1.26)

Duration of breastfeeding, mo
 Never 9,079 406 72,648.3 5.6 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 <6 7,408 285 59,689.5 4.8 0.85 (0.73-0.99) 0.86 (0.73-1.00) 0.86 (0.73-1.00)
 6-11 24,786 1,272 197,014.4 6.5 1.16 (1.03-1.29) 0.97 (0.86-1.09) 0.97 (0.86-1.10)
 ≥12 139,990 9,316 1,097,696.8 8.5 1.52 (1.37-1.68) 1.00 (0.90-1.12) 1.00 (0.90-1.12)

Duration of HRT, yr
 Never 159,628 10,490 1,250,819.9 8.4 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 <2 12,764 454 104,141.8 4.4 0.52a (0.47-0.57) 0.76a (0.69-0.83) 0.76a (0.69-0.83)
 2-4 4,819 174 39,103.8 4.5 0.53a (0.46-0.62) 0.79b (0.68-0.92) 0.79b (0.68-0.92)
 ≥5 4,052 161 32,983.5 4.9 0.58a (0.50-0.68) 0.78b (0.67-0.91) 0.78b (0.67-0.92)

Duration of OC use, yr
 Never 150,657 9,611 1,182,741.3 8.1 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 <1 17,012 875 136,097.6 6.4 0.79 (0.74-0.85) 0.94 (0.88-1.01) 0.94 (0.88-1.01)
 ≥1 13,594 793 108,210.1 7.3 0.90 (0.84-0.97) 1.02 (0.94-1.09) 1.02 (0.95-1.10)

Model 1: non-adjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age at menarche, age at menopause, number of parities, duration of breastfeeding, duration of HRT, duration of oral contraceptive use, alcohol consumption, smoking, regular exercise, income, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, use of three or more oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin treatment, use of insulin secretagogues such as sulfonylureas and glinides; Model 3: adjusted for reproductive life span instead of age at menarche and menopause in Model 2.

HR, hazard ratio; SH, severe hypoglycemia; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; OC, oral contraceptive.

a P<0.0001 compared with reference values,

b P<0.05 compared with reference values.

Table 3
Subgroup analysis for hazard ratios of severe hypoglycemia by reproductive factors for subgroup aged <65, and ≥65 in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Subgroup RLS, yr No. of subjects No. of SH event Follow-up duration, person-year Incidence rate, /1,000 person-year HR (95% CI)a P for interaction
Age, yr 0.0032
 <65 <30 10,490 455 85,499.5 5.3 1 (Ref)
30-34 34,372 1,199 281,346.4 4.3 0.83 (0.74-0.92)
35-39 38,296 1,078 313,943.3 3.4 0.69 (0.62-0.77)
≥40 7,490 221 61,229.0 3.6 0.64 (0.54-0.75)
 ≥65 <30 17,640 1,837 131,540.8 14.0 1 (Ref)
30-34 39,738 3,797 299,080.3 12.7 0.93 (0.88-0.99)
35-39 26,607 2,202 203,366.2 10.8 0.85 (0.80-0.90)
≥40 6,630 490 51,043.5 9.6 0.79 (0.71-0.87)

RLS, reproductive life span; SH, severe hypoglycemia; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a Adjusted for age, fasting glucose level, RLS, number of parities, duration of breastfeeding, duration of hormone replacement therapy, duration of oral contraceptives use, alcohol consumption, smoking, regular exercise, income, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, use of three or more oral hypoglycemic agents, use of insulin secretagogues such as sulfonylureas and glinides, insulin treatment.


1. Gillies GE, McArthur S. Estrogen actions in the brain and the basis for differential action in men and women: a case for sex-specific medicines. Pharmacol Rev 2010;62:155-98.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
2. Patel S, Homaei A, Raju AB, Meher BR. Estrogen: the necessary evil for human health, and ways to tame it. Biomed Pharmacother 2018;102:403-11.
Article  PubMed 
3. Shadyab AH, Macera CA, Shaffer RA, Jain S, Gallo LC, Gass ML, et al. Ages at menarche and menopause and reproductive lifespan as predictors of exceptional longevity in women: the Women’s Health Initiative. Menopause 2017;24:35-44.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
4. Brand JS, van der Schouw YT, Onland-Moret NC, Sharp SJ, Ong KK, Khaw KT, et al. Age at menopause, reproductive life span, and type 2 diabetes risk: results from the EPIC-InterAct study. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1012-9.
PubMed  PMC 
5. Iqbal A, Heller S. Managing hypoglycaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;30:413-30.
Article  PubMed 
6. Choi SY, Ko SH. Severe hypoglycemia as a preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Korean J Intern Med 2021;36:263-70.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
7. Silbert R, Salcido-Montenegro A, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Katabi A, McCoy RG. Hypoglycemia among patients with type 2 diabetes: epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention strategies. Curr Diab Rep 2018;18:53.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
8. McCoy RG, Van Houten HK, Ziegenfuss JY, Shah ND, Wermers RA, Smith SA. Increased mortality of patients with diabetes reporting severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1897-901.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
9. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Clegg DJ, Hevener AL. The role of estrogens in control of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Endocr Rev 2013;34:309-38.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
10. Briski KP, Nedungadi TP. Adaptation of feeding and counter-regulatory hormone responses to intermediate insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in the ovariectomised female rat: effects of oestradiol. J Neuroendocrinol 2009;21:578-85.
Article  PubMed 
11. Guillaume M, Montagner A, Fontaine C, Lenfant F, Arnal JF, Gourdy P. Nuclear and membrane actions of estrogen receptor alpha: contribution to the regulation of energy and glucose homeostasis. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017;1043:401-26.
Article  PubMed 
12. de Souza Santos R, Frank AP, Nelson MD, Garcia MM, Palmer BF, Clegg DJ. Sex, gender, and transgender: metabolic impact of cross hormone therapy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017;1043:611-27.
Article  PubMed 
13. Jung CH, Son JW, Kang S, Kim WJ, Kim HS, Kim HS, et al. Diabetes fact sheets in Korea, 2020: an appraisal of current status. Diabetes Metab J 2021;45:1-10.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
14. Seong SC, Kim YY, Khang YH, Heon Park J, Kang HJ, Lee H, et al. Data resource profile: the National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:799-800.
15. Kim HK, Song SO, Noh J, Jeong IK, Lee BW. Data configuration and publication trends for the Korean National Health Insurance and Health Insurance Review & Assessment Database. Diabetes Metab J 2020;44:671-8.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
16. Takahashi TA, Johnson KM. Menopause. Med Clin North Am 2015;99:521-34.
Article  PubMed 
17. Yun JS, Park YM, Han K, Cha SA, Ahn YB, Ko SH. Severe hypoglycemia and the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2019;18:103.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
18. Yun JS, Ko SH. Current trends in epidemiology of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk management in type 2 diabetes. Metabolism 2021;123:154838.
Article  PubMed 
19. Lee SE, Kim KA, Son KJ, Song SO, Park KH, Park SH, et al. Trends and risk factors in severe hypoglycemia among individuals with type 2 diabetes in Korea. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021;178:108946.
Article  PubMed 
20. Yun JS, Park YM, Han K, Kim HW, Cha SA, Ahn YB, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and the risk of end stage renal disease in type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep 2021;11:4305.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
21. Yoo JE, Shin DW, Han K, Kim D, Yoon JW, Lee DY. Association of female reproductive factors with incidence of fracture among postmenopausal women in Korea. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2030405.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
22. Kim SK, Jang JY, Kim DL, Rhyu YA, Lee SE, Ko SH, et al. Site-specific cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 2020;35:641-51.
Article  PubMed 
23. Han K, Yun JS, Park YM, Ahn YB, Cho JH, Cha SA, et al. Development and validation of a risk prediction model for severe hypoglycemia in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Clin Epidemiol 2018;10:1545-59.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
24. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837-53.
25. McCoy RG, Lipska KJ, Yao X, Ross JS, Montori VM, Shah ND. Intensive treatment and severe hypoglycemia among adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:969-78.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
26. Workgroup on Hypoglycemia, American Diabetes Association. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1245-9.
27. Lee AK, Warren B, Lee CJ, McEvoy JW, Matsushita K, Huang ES, et al. The association of severe hypoglycemia with incident cardiovascular events and mortality in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2018;41:104-11.
Article  PubMed 
28. Frier BM, Schernthaner G, Heller SR. Hypoglycemia and cardiovascular risks. Diabetes Care 2011;34(Suppl 2):S132-7.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
29. Davis SN, Fowler S, Costa F. Hypoglycemic counterregulatory responses differ between men and women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2000;49:65-72.
Article  PubMed 
30. The DCCT Research Group. Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial. Am J Med 1991;90:450-9.
31. Davis SN, Shavers C, Costa F. Gender-related differences in counterregulatory responses to antecedent hypoglycemia in normal humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:2148-57.
Article  PubMed 
32. Briski KP, Alhamami HN, Alshamrani A, Mandal SK, Shakya M, Ibrahim MH. Sex differences and role of estradiol in hypoglycemia-associated counter-regulation. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017;1043:359-83.
Article  PubMed 
33. Bremer JP, Baron M, Peters H, Oltmanns KM, Kern W, Fehm HL, et al. Hormonal, subjective, and neurocognitive responses to brief hypoglycemia in postmenopausal women and age-matched men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 2006;55:331-8.
Article  PubMed 
34. Seale JV, Wood SA, Atkinson HC, Harbuz MS, Lightman SL. Gonadal steroid replacement reverses gonadectomy-induced changes in the corticosterone pulse profile and stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity of male and female rats. J Neuroendocrinol 2004;16:989-98.
Article  PubMed 
35. Paranjape SA, Briski KP. Recurrent insulin-induced hypoglycemia causes site-specific patterns of habituation or amplification of CNS neuronal genomic activation. Neuroscience 2005;130:957-70.
Article  PubMed 
36. Nedungadi TP, Goleman WL, Paranjape SA, Kale AY, Briski KP. Effects of estradiol on glycemic and CNS neuronal activational responses to recurrent insulin-induced hypoglycemia in the ovariectomized female rat. Neuroendocrinology 2006;84:235-42.
Article  PubMed 
37. Salpeter SR, Walsh JM, Ormiston TM, Greyber E, Buckley NS, Salpeter EE. Meta-analysis: effect of hormone-replacement therapy on components of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Obes Metab 2006;8:538-54.
Article  PubMed 
38. Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA 2013;310:1353-68.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
39. Cignarella A, Kratz M, Bolego C. Emerging role of estrogen in the control of cardiometabolic disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2010;31:183-9.
Article  PubMed 
40. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Manson JE, Stevenson JC, Fonseca VA. Menopausal hormone therapy and type 2 diabetes prevention: evidence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Endocr Rev 2017;38:173-88.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
41. Hodis HN, Mack WJ. Hormone replacement therapy and the association with coronary heart disease and overall mortality: clinical application of the timing hypothesis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2014;142:68-75.
Article  PubMed 
42. Pereira RI, Casey BA, Swibas TA, Erickson CB, Wolfe P, Van Pelt RE. Timing of estradiol treatment after menopause may determine benefit or harm to insulin action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:4456-62.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
43. Wend K, Wend P, Krum SA. Tissue-specific effects of loss of estrogen during menopause and aging. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2012;3:19.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
44. Barros RP, Gabbi C, Morani A, Warner M, Gustafsson JA. Participation of ERalpha and ERbeta in glucose homeostasis in skeletal muscle and white adipose tissue. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2009;297:E124-33.
45. Darko DA, Dornhorst A, Kennedy G, Mandeno RC, Seed M. Glycaemic control and plasma lipoproteins in menopausal women with type 2 diabetes treated with oral and transdermal combined hormone replacement therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2001;54:157-64.
Article  PubMed 
46. Stojanovic ND, Kwong P, Byrne DJ, Arnold A, Jagroop IA, Nair D, et al. The effects of transdermal estradiol alone or with cyclical dydrogesterone on markers of cardiovascular disease risk in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. Angiology 2003;54:391-9.
Article  PubMed 
47. Bean JA, Leeper JD, Wallace RB, Sherman BM, Jagger H. Variations in the reporting of menstrual histories. Am J Epidemiol 1979;109:181-5.
Article  PubMed 
48. Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Stason WB, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, et al. Reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:319-25.
Article  PubMed 
49. Langer RD, Hodis HN, Lobo RA, Allison MA. Hormone replacement therapy: where are we now? Climacteric 2021;24:3-10.
50. Hammar ML, van de Weijer P, Franke HR, Pornel B, von Mauw EM, Nijland EA, et al. Tibolone and low-dose continuous combined hormone treatment: vaginal bleeding pattern, efficacy and tolerability. BJOG 2007;114:1522-9.
Article  PubMed 
51. Kyvernitakis I, Kostev K, Hars O, Albert US, Hadji P. Discontinuation rates of menopausal hormone therapy among postmenopausal women in the post-WHI study era. Climacteric 2015;18:737-42.
Article  PubMed 
52. Kim C. Management of cardiovascular risk in perimenopausal women with diabetes. Diabetes Metab J 2021;45:492-501.
Article  PubMed  PMC 
53. Kang BM, Kim MR, Park HM, Yoon BK, Lee BS, Chung HW, et al. Attitudes of Korean clinicians to postmenopausal hormone therapy after the Women’s Health Initiative study. Menopause 2006;13:125-9.
Article  PubMed 
54. Kim MK, Jung YS, Chon SJ, Yun BH, Cho S, Choi YS, et al. Common causes of postmenopausal bleeding in Korean women: 10-year outcomes from a single medical center. J Korean Med Sci 2017;32:830-4.
Article  PubMed  PMC 

Editorial Office
101-2104, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea​
Tel: +82-2-714-9064    Fax: +82-2-714-9084    E-mail: diabetes@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2022 by Korean Diabetes Association.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer