Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal

Search
OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Autoimmune diabetes"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Short Communication
Others
Article image
Comparison of Insulin-Treated Patients with Ambiguous Diabetes Type with Definite Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Subjects: A Clinical Perspective
Insa Laspe, Juris J. Meier, Michael A. Nauck
Diabetes Metab J. 2023;47(1):140-146.   Published online March 22, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0322
  • 65,535 View
  • 196 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReader   ePub   
In clinical practice, the distinction between type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can be challenging, leaving patients with “ambiguous” diabetes type. Insulin-treated patients (n=115) previously diagnosed with T2DM had to be re-classified based on clinical phenotype and laboratory results, and were operationally defined as having an ambiguous diabetes type. They were compared against patients with definite T1DM and T2DM regarding 12 clinical and laboratory features typically different between diabetes types. Characteristics of patients with ambiguous diabetes type, representing approximately 6% of all patients with T1DM or T2DM seen at our specialized clinic, fell in between those of patients with definite T1DM and T2DM, both regarding individual features and with respect to a novel classification based on multi-variable regression analysis (P<0.0001). In conclusion, a substantial proportion of diabetes patients in a tertiary care centre presented with an “ambiguous” diabetes type. Their clinical characteristics fall in between those of definite T1DM or T2DM patients.
Original Article
Technology/Device
Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Autoantibody Detection by Electrochemiluminescence Assay Identifies Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults with Poor Islet Function
Yuxiao Zhu, Li Qian, Qing Liu, Jing Zou, Ying Zhou, Tao Yang, Gan Huang, Zhiguang Zhou, Yu Liu
Diabetes Metab J. 2020;44(2):260-266.   Published online November 12, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2019.0007
  • 6,218 View
  • 139 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader   
Background

The detection of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) autoantibodies is essential for the prediction and diagnosis of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA). The aim of the current study was to compare a newly developed electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-GAD65 antibody assay with the established radiobinding assay, and to explore whether the new assay could be used to define LADA more precisely.

Methods

Serum samples were harvested from 141 patients with LADA, 95 with type 1 diabetes mellitus, and 99 with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and tested for GAD65 autoantibodies using both the radiobinding assay and ECL assay. A glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA) competition assay was also performed to assess antibody affinity. Furthermore, the clinical features of these patients were compared.

Results

Eighty-eight out of 141 serum samples (62.4%) from LADA patients were GAD65 antibody-positive by ECL assay. Compared with ECL-GAD65 antibody-negative patients, ECL-GAD65 antibody-positive patients were leaner (P<0.0001), had poorer β-cell function (P<0.05), and were more likely to have other diabetes-associated autoantibodies. The β-cell function of ECL-GAD65 antibody-positive patients was similar to that of type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, whereas ECL-GAD65 antibody-negative patients were more similar to type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Conclusion

Patients with ECL-GAD65 antibody-negative share a similar phenotype with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, whereas patients with ECL-GAD65 antibody-positive resemble those with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Thus, the detection of GADA using ECL may help to identify the subtype of LADA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024
    Nuha A. ElSayed, Grazia Aleppo, Raveendhara R. Bannuru, Dennis Bruemmer, Billy S. Collins, Laya Ekhlaspour, Jason L. Gaglia, Marisa E. Hilliard, Eric L. Johnson, Kamlesh Khunti, Ildiko Lingvay, Glenn Matfin, Rozalina G. McCoy, Mary Lou Perry, Scott J. Pil
    Diabetes Care.2024; 47(Supplement): S20.     CrossRef
  • 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023
    Nuha A. ElSayed, Grazia Aleppo, Vanita R. Aroda, Raveendhara R. Bannuru, Florence M. Brown, Dennis Bruemmer, Billy S. Collins, Jason L. Gaglia, Marisa E. Hilliard, Diana Isaacs, Eric L. Johnson, Scott Kahan, Kamlesh Khunti, Jose Leon, Sarah K. Lyons, Mary
    Diabetes Care.2023; 46(Supplement): S19.     CrossRef
  • Determination of autoantibodies in type 2 diabetes: one simple way to improve classification
    Johnny Ludvigsson
    Diabetologia.2023; 66(5): 955.     CrossRef
  • 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022

    Diabetes Care.2022; 45(Supplement): S17.     CrossRef
  • Screening Strategy for Islet Autoantibodies in Diabetes Patients of Different Ages
    Xixi Nan, Xia Li, Yufei Xiang, Xiang Yan, Houde Zhou, Xiaohan Tang, Jin Cheng, Xiaohong Niu, Jing Liu, Qiuhe Ji, Linong Ji, Gan Huang, Zhiguang Zhou
    Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.2022; 24(3): 212.     CrossRef
  • Atypical Diabetes and Management Considerations
    Shivajirao Prakash Patil
    Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice.2022; 49(2): 225.     CrossRef
  • Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: a focus on β-cell protection and therapy
    Wenfeng Yin, Shuoming Luo, Zilin Xiao, Ziwei Zhang, Bingwen Liu, Zhiguang Zhou
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of detrended fluctuation function derived from continuous glucose monitoring may assist in distinguishing latent autoimmune diabetes in adults from T2DM
    Liyin Zhang, Qi Tian, Keyu Guo, Jieru Wu, Jianan Ye, Zhiyi Ding, Qin Zhou, Gan Huang, Xia Li, Zhiguang Zhou, Lin Yang
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of antibodies targeting ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 2L3 and eukaryote translation elongation factor 1 α1 in Chinese Han and American Caucasian populations with type 1 diabetes
    Li Qian, Yuxiao Zhu, Yan Luo, Mu Zhang, Liping Yu, Yu Liu, Tao Yang
    Endocrine Connections.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021

    Diabetes Care.2021; 44(Supplement): S15.     CrossRef
  • High-Affinity ZnT8 Autoantibodies by Electrochemiluminescence Assay Improve Risk Prediction for Type 1 Diabetes
    Xiaofan Jia, Ling He, Dongmei Miao, Kathleen Waugh, Cristy Geno Rasmussen, Fran Dong, Andrea K Steck, Marian Rewers, Liping Yu
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lada or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - A Challenging Diagnosis in Clinical Approach
    Lucia Mihaela Custură, Oana Deteşan, Raluca Maria Tilinca, Reka Annamaria Schmiedt, Brigitta Irén Bacso, Mariana Cornelia Tilinca
    Acta Medica Transilvanica.2021; 26(3): 55.     CrossRef
  • A fluorescence enhancement assay for measurement of glutamate decarboxylase activity
    Messripour Manoochehr, Mesripour Azadeh
    Open Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.2020; : 007.     CrossRef
Review
Clinical Diabetes & Therapeutics
Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults: A Review on Clinical Implications and Management
Silvia Pieralice, Paolo Pozzilli
Diabetes Metab J. 2018;42(6):451-464.   Published online December 17, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2018.0190
  • 14,900 View
  • 592 Download
  • 51 Web of Science
  • 62 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader   

Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by a less intensive autoimmune process and a broad clinical phenotype compared to classical type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), sharing features with both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and T1DM. Since patients affected by LADA are initially insulin independent and recognizable only by testing for islet-cell autoantibodies, it could be difficult to identify LADA in clinical setting and a high misdiagnosis rate still remains among patients with T2DM. Ideally, islet-cell autoantibodies screening should be performed in subjects with newly diagnosed T2DM, ensuring a closer monitoring of those resulted positive and avoiding treatment of hyperglycaemia which might increase the rate of β-cells loss. Thus, since the autoimmune process in LADA seems to be slower than in classical T1DM, there is a wider window for new therapeutic interventions that may slow down β-cell failure. This review summarizes the current understanding of LADA, by evaluating data from most recent studies, the actual gaps in diagnosis and management. Finally, we critically highlight and discuss novel findings and future perspectives on the therapeutic approach in LADA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Comprehensive Survey on Diabetes Type-2 (T2D) Forecast Using Machine Learning
    Satyanarayana Murthy nimmagadda, Gunnam Suryanarayana, Gangu Bharath Kumar, Ganta Anudeep, Gedela Vinay Sai
    Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.2024; 31(5): 2905.     CrossRef
  • Ensemble machine learning reveals key features for diabetes duration from electronic health records
    Gabriel Cerono, Davide Chicco
    PeerJ Computer Science.2024; 10: e1896.     CrossRef
  • LADA 30th anniversary: A growing form of diabetes with persistent unresolved questions
    Ivy Lee Jia Jia, Raffaella Buzzetti, Richard David Leslie, Paolo Pozzilli
    Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significance of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine intervention for patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sunil B. Korde, Smita R. Pillewan, Sanket R. Dumbre, Anjali R. Bandgar, Prajakta S. Shinde, Sunil Gairola, Vandana S. Nikam
    Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews.2024; : 103102.     CrossRef
  • Autoantibodies to Truncated GAD(96-585) Antigen Stratify Risk of Early Insulin Requirement in Adult-Onset Diabetes
    Sian L. Grace, Kathleen M. Gillespie, Claire L. Williams, Vito Lampasona, Peter Achenbach, Ewan R. Pearson, Alistair J.K. Williams, Anna E. Long, Timothy J. McDonald, Angus G. Jones
    Diabetes.2024; 73(10): 1583.     CrossRef
  • A Curious Case of New-Onset Diabetes
    Kristina Hernandez, Charity L. Tan
    The Journal for Nurse Practitioners.2023; 19(3): 104411.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive review: Frailty in pancreas transplant candidates and recipients
    Ronald F. Parsons, Ekamol Tantisattamo, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Arpita Basu, Yee Lu, Krista L. Lentine, Kenneth J. Woodside, Neeraj Singh, Joseph Scalea, Tarek Alhamad, Ty B. Dunn, Franco H. Cabeza Rivera, Sandesh Parajuli, Martha Pavlakis, Matthew Cooper
    Clinical Transplantation.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Managing latent autoimmune disease in adults
    David Morris
    Independent Nurse.2023; 2023(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a clinical score for identifying patients with high risk of latent autoimmune adult diabetes (LADA): The LADA primary care-protocol study
    Pilar Vich-Pérez, Juan Carlos Abánades-Herranz, Gustavo Mora-Navarro, Ángela María Carrasco-Sayalero, Miguel Ángel Salinero-Fort, Ignacio Sevilla-Machuca, Mar Sanz-Pascual, Cristina Álvarez Hernández-Cañizares, Carmen de Burgos-Lunar, Vijayaprakash Suppia
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0281657.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Dilemmas and Current Treatment Approaches in Latent Onset Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults: A Concise Review
    Lakshmi Chandran, Ankul Singh S., Chitra Vellapandian
    Current Diabetes Reviews.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anti-glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibody-Positive Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in the Early Postpartum Period: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Akiko Fujishima, Yohei Onodera, Hiroshi Miura, Yukihiro Terada
    The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine.2023; 259(4): 327.     CrossRef
  • Een 54-jarige man met onverklaard gewichtsverlies
    N. Mutebi, A. Kharagjitsing
    Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin on immunometabolism, microbiome and liver diseases
    Muhammad Umair Ijaz, Farzam Vaziri, Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan
    Liver Research.2023; 7(2): 116.     CrossRef
  • The Etiological Diagnosis of Diabetes: Still a Challenge for the Clinician
    Danièle Dubois-Laforgue, José Timsit
    Endocrines.2023; 4(2): 437.     CrossRef
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus: features of differential diagnosis
    EV Gantsgorn, OV Denisenko, YaO Osipenko, DA Kalmykova, AV Ivanov, SS Gerasyuta, GA Bulguryan, MH Ivanova, DA Saakyan
    Bulletin of Russian State Medical University.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A 1‐year pilot study of intralymphatic injections of GAD‐alum in individuals with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) with signs of high immunity: No safety concerns and resemblance to juvenile type 1 diabetes
    Ingrid K. Hals, Chandima Balasuriya, Rosaura Casas, Johnny Ludvigsson, Anneli Björklund, Valdemar Grill
    Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism.2023; 25(11): 3400.     CrossRef
  • The relationship between red blood cell distribution width and islet β-cell function indexes in patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults
    Xiuli Fu, Qin Tan, Wei Wei, Sheng Ding, Zhongjing Wang
    BMC Endocrine Disorders.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Review on Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults
    Vijay Ravikumar, Ariba Ahmed, Ashish Anjankar
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neutrophils and their role in the aetiopathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes
    Anna Giovenzana, Debora Carnovale, Brett Phillips, Alessandra Petrelli, Nick Giannoukakis
    Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adult Based on the Presence of GAD 65 Antibodies in North-Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India
    Himalina Sangma, Anshul Singh, Anubha Srivastava, Vatsala Misra
    Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India).2022; 58: 17.     CrossRef
  • Serum Bile Acid Profiles in Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults and Type 2 Diabetes Patients
    Yu Zhou, Deli Ye, Xiaofen Yuan, Yonglie Zhou, Jun Xia, Giuseppe Pugliese
    Journal of Diabetes Research.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Early life Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination and incidence of type 1, type 2, and latent autoimmune diabetes in adulthood
    Philippe Corsenac, Marie-Élise Parent, Hélène Mansaray, Andrea Benedetti, Hugues Richard, Simona Stäger, Marie-Claude Rousseau
    Diabetes & Metabolism.2022; 48(3): 101337.     CrossRef
  • Atypical Diabetes and Management Considerations
    Shivajirao Prakash Patil
    Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice.2022; 49(2): 225.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and insulin for latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Tong Lin, Yinhe Cai, Liting Tang, Youwei Lian, Min Liu, Chaonan Liu
    Journal of Diabetes Investigation.2022; 13(9): 1506.     CrossRef
  • Latent autoimmune diabetes in youth shows greater autoimmunity than latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: Evidence from a nationwide, multicenter, cross‐sectional study
    Jin Cheng, Xiaohan Tang, Xiang Yan, Gan Huang, Shuoming Luo, Zhiguang Zhou, Xia Li
    Pediatric Diabetes.2022; 23(5): 578.     CrossRef
  • Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults and Metabolic Syndrome—A Mini Review
    Niansi Pan, Shimei Yang, Xiaohong Niu
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lifestyle or Environmental Influences and Their Interaction With Genetic Susceptibility on the Risk of LADA
    Sofia Carlsson
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Antigen-specific immunotherapies in type 1 diabetes
    Xuejiao Zhang, Ying Dong, Dianyuan Liu, Liu Yang, Jiayi Xu, Qing Wang
    Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.2022; 73: 127040.     CrossRef
  • Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: a focus on β-cell protection and therapy
    Wenfeng Yin, Shuoming Luo, Zilin Xiao, Ziwei Zhang, Bingwen Liu, Zhiguang Zhou
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic camouflage: A case report on Latent autoimmune diabetics of adulthood
    Sandhya kiran Neupane, Prakash Paudel Jaishi, Divyaa Koirala, Arjun Kandel, Prabhat Kiran Neupane
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular risk profile in children and adolescents with latent autoimmune diabetes: Results from the German/Austrian prospective diabetes follow‐up registry
    Alena Welters, Sascha R. Tittel, Thomas Reinehr, Daniel Weghuber, Susanna Wiegand, Wolfram Karges, Clemens Freiberg, Thomas Meissner, Nanette C. Schloot, Reinhard W. Holl
    Pediatric Diabetes.2022; 23(8): 1602.     CrossRef
  • The utility of assessing C-peptide in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study
    Tuccinardi Dario, Giorgino Riccardo, Pieralice Silvia, Watanabe Mikiko, Maggi Daria, Palermo Andrea, Defeudis Giuseppe, Fioriti Elvira, Pozzilli Paolo, Manfrini Silvia
    Acta Diabetologica.2021; 58(4): 411.     CrossRef
  • Cross-reactive peptide epitopes of Enterovirus Coxsackie B4 and human glutamic acid decarboxylase detecting antibodies in latent autoimmune diabetes in adults versus type 1 diabetes
    Feliciana Real-Fernández, Alessandra Gallo, Francesca Nuti, Lorenzo Altamore, Gloria Giovanna Del Vescovo, Pietro Traldi, Eugenio Ragazzi, Paolo Rovero, Annunziata Lapolla, Anna Maria Papini
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2021; 515: 73.     CrossRef
  • Treating latent autoimmune diabetes in adults in the era of cardiovascular outcomes trials: Old dog should learn new tricks
    Theocharis Koufakis, Prashanth Vas, Kalliopi Kotsa
    Diabetic Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Defining and Classifying New Subgroups of Diabetes
    Ashok Balasubramanyam
    Annual Review of Medicine.2021; 72(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • Slowly evolving, immune-mediated diabetes in 14-year-old patient: a case report
    M. R. Ragimov, D. D. Omelchuk, L. I. Ibragimova, O. S. Derevyanko, T. V. Nikonova
    Diabetes mellitus.2021; 24(1): 70.     CrossRef
  • The role of autoimmunity in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes: Looking at the other side of the moon
    Theocharis Koufakis, George Dimitriadis, Symeon Metallidis, Pantelis Zebekakis, Kalliopi Kotsa
    Obesity Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dapagliflozin as an Adjunct Therapy to Insulin in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Efficacy and Safety of this Combination
    Johan H Jendle, Francisco J Ampudia-Blasco, Martin Füchtenbusch, Paolo Pozzilli
    European Endocrinology.2021; 1(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Dapagliflozin as an Adjunct Therapy to Insulin in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Efficacy and Safety of this Combination
    Johan H Jendle, Francisco J Ampudia-Blasco, Martin Füchtenbusch, Paolo Pozzilli
    touchREVIEWS in Endocrinology.2021; 17(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Toward an Improved Classification of Type 2 Diabetes: Lessons From Research into the Heterogeneity of a Complex Disease
    Maria J Redondo, Ashok Balasubramanyam
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2021; 106(12): e4822.     CrossRef
  • Bacillus Calmette-Guerin 's beneficial impact on glucose metabolism: Evidence for broad based applications
    Gabriella F. Shpilsky, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Anna Aristarkhova, Michele Weil, Nathan Ng, Kacie J. Nelson, Amanda Lee, Hui Zheng, Willem M. Kühtreiber, Denise L. Faustman
    iScience.2021; 24(10): 103150.     CrossRef
  • Masqueraders: how to identify atypical diabetes in primary care
    Sumera Ahmed, Sana Saeed, Jay H. Shubrook
    Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2021; 121(12): 899.     CrossRef
  • Lada or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - A Challenging Diagnosis in Clinical Approach
    Lucia Mihaela Custură, Oana Deteşan, Raluca Maria Tilinca, Reka Annamaria Schmiedt, Brigitta Irén Bacso, Mariana Cornelia Tilinca
    Acta Medica Transilvanica.2021; 26(3): 55.     CrossRef
  • Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Immunomodulatory Properties of Tea—The Positive Impact of Tea Consumption on Patients with Autoimmune Diabetes
    Anna Winiarska-Mieczan, Ewa Tomaszewska, Karolina Jachimowicz
    Nutrients.2021; 13(11): 3972.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques for Microvascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes
    Nitigya Sambyal, Poonam Saini, Rupali Syal
    Current Diabetes Reviews.2021; 17(2): 143.     CrossRef
  • Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of the Adult
    Marta Guimarães, Sofia S. Pereira, Mário Nora, Mariana P. Monteiro
    Obesity Facts.2021; 14(4): 425.     CrossRef
  • Особливості перебігу діабетичної хвороби нирок у хворих на латентний автоімунний діабет дорослих
    I.O. Tsaryk, N.V. Pashkovska
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (Ukraine).2021; 17(2): 116.     CrossRef
  • Latenter Autoimmundiabetes im Erwachsenen- und Kindesalter
    Alena Welters, Nanette C. Schloot
    Der Diabetologe.2020; 16(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • A treatment-based algorithm for identification of diabetes type in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
    Mitra Mosslemi, Hannah L. Park, Christine E. McLaren, Nathan D. Wong
    Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism.2020; 9(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • Case 6-2020: A 34-Year-Old Woman with Hyperglycemia
    Richard C. Cabot, Eric S. Rosenberg, Virginia M. Pierce, David M. Dudzinski, Meridale V. Baggett, Dennis C. Sgroi, Jo-Anne O. Shepard, Kathy M. Tran, Emily K. McDonald, Tara Corpuz, Miriam S. Udler, Camille E. Powe, Christina A. Austin-Tse
    New England Journal of Medicine.2020; 382(8): 745.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic approaches for latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: One size does not fit all
    Theocharis Koufakis, Niki Katsiki, Pantelis Zebekakis, George Dimitriadis, Kalliopi Kotsa
    Journal of Diabetes.2020; 12(2): 110.     CrossRef
  • Grenzformen zwischen Typ-1- und Typ-2-Diabetes
    Michael Hummel
    MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin.2020; 162(11): 60.     CrossRef
  • The Differential Expression of Long Noncoding RNAs in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults
    Zhang Pengyu, Yan Yan, Fu Xiying, Yang Maoguang, Li Mo, Cheng Yan, Shen Hong, Wang Lijuan, Zhang Xiujuan, Cai Hanqing
    International Journal of Endocrinology.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • A convenient diagnostic tool for discriminating adult-onset glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody-positive autoimmune diabetes from type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study
    Hon-Ke Sia, Shih-Te Tu, Pei-Yung Liao, Kuan-Han Lin, Chew-Teng Kor, Ling-Ling Yeh
    PeerJ.2020; 8: e8610.     CrossRef
  • Correct Diabetes Diagnosis and Treatment Allows Sailor to Remain on Active Duty
    Andrea R Frazier
    Military Medicine.2020; 185(9-10): e1843.     CrossRef
  • Hombre de 28 años con presentación de diabetes
    M. Ricci, J. Sanz Cánovas, V. Buonaluto, R. Gómez Huelgas
    Medicine - Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado.2020; 13(16): 942.e1.     CrossRef
  • Uncommon Presentations of Diabetes: Zebras in the Herd
    Karen L. Shidler, Lisa R. Letourneau, Lucia M. Novak
    Clinical Diabetes.2020; 38(1): 78.     CrossRef
  • Ketogenic Diet as a Trigger for Diabetic Ketoacidosis in a Misdiagnosis of Diabetes: A Case Report
    Alexander J. White-Cotsmire, Amber M. Healy
    Clinical Diabetes.2020; 38(3): 318.     CrossRef
  • Subphänotypen des Diabetes
    Oana Patricia Zaharia, Julia Szendrödi
    Der Diabetologe.2019; 15(4): 288.     CrossRef
  • Autoimmunity in latent autoimmune diabetes in adults
    Alessandro P. Delitala
    AIMS Medical Science.2019; 6(2): 132.     CrossRef
  • Risk of diabetes-associated diseases in subgroups of patients with recent-onset diabetes: a 5-year follow-up study
    Oana P Zaharia, Klaus Strassburger, Alexander Strom, Gidon J Bönhof, Yanislava Karusheva, Sofia Antoniou, Kálmán Bódis, Daniel F Markgraf, Volker Burkart, Karsten Müssig, Jong-Hee Hwang, Olof Asplund, Leif Groop, Emma Ahlqvist, Jochen Seissler, Peter Nawr
    The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.2019; 7(9): 684.     CrossRef
  • The Influence of Type 2 Diabetes–Associated Factors on Type 1 Diabetes
    Maria J. Redondo, Carmella Evans-Molina, Andrea K. Steck, Mark A. Atkinson, Jay Sosenko
    Diabetes Care.2019; 42(8): 1357.     CrossRef
Original Article
Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Diabetics Who are Positive for GAD Autoantibody.
Seon Joong Moon, Chan Hee Lee, Jun Sung Moon, Hee Jung Moon, Ji Eun Lee, Kyung Ah Chun, Ji Sung Yoon, Ihn Ho Cho, Kyu Chang Won, Hyoung Woo Lee
Korean Diabetes J. 2007;31(5):429-434.   Published online September 1, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/jkda.2007.31.5.429
  • 2,550 View
  • 21 Download
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
BACKGROUND
Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of adult blindness. Some patients show early development and progression of diabetic retinopathy despite of apparently good glycemic control. This is suggesting the involvement of other contributing factors. Recent studies have shown that retinopathy and GAD autoantibody (GADA) show an inverse relationship immunologically. This study is designed to investigate the clinical manifestation of diabetes who are positive for GADA and the relationship between GADA and diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: Type 1 diabetic patients & LADA patients who had visited Yeungnam university Medical Center from 1988 to 2005 were involved. We reviewed the pathologic and laboratory records of these patients and investigated the development of diabetic microvascular complications. RESULTS: Compared with patients who had GADA negative diabetes, patients with GADA positive diabetes had lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (GADA negative subject: 25.8% vs. GADA positive subject: 9.6%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We confirmed that diabetic retinopathy and GADA showed an inverse relationship. It seems quite probable that GADA may contribute to the prevention of retinopathy. Further research should be needed concerning the effect of GADA on diabetic retinopathy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Chronic Complications in Adult Diabetic Patients with and without GAD Antibody
    Jin Ook Chung, Dong Hyeok Cho, Dong Jin Chung, Min Young Chung
    Korean Diabetes Journal.2009; 33(2): 124.     CrossRef
Case Report
A Case of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in a GAD Antibody-positive Diabetes Patients who Recently Experienced Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State.
Jang Won Son, Seok Hong Lee, Jung Ahn Lee, Jaetaek Kim, Yeon Sahng Oh, Soon Hyun Shinn
Korean Diabetes J. 2005;29(3):267-270.   Published online May 1, 2005
  • 1,112 View
  • 20 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
The term latent autoimmune diabetes in adults(LADA) was introduced to define adult diabetic patients who initially do not require insulin, but they have the immune markers of type 1 diabetes and in a number of cases, these patients progress to insulin dependency. LADA patients have several features of classic type 1 diabetes in addition to islet cell antibody positivity, including high rates of HLA-DR3 and DR4. We describe here a case of a patient with a diagnosis of LADA who, having been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, was affected with diabetic ketoacidosis. In April 2000, a 65-year-old man was admitted to Chung-Ang University Hospital due to his decreased cognitive ability. The patient was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 30-years ago and he was diagnosed 6-month ago as being in a hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. He was positive for antibodies against GAD(anti-GAD, 31U/mL). His weight was 70kg, height 167cm, BMI 25 kg/m2 and the blood pressure was 86/52mmHg. No abnormalities on the physical examination were found. His acid-base balance was pH 6.937, serum bicarbonate 2.2mmol/L and the anion gap 38; he also had a strong positive reaction for ketones in his urine and serum. During half a year, the fasting C-peptide level decreased from 0.65nmol/L to 0.13nmol/L, which means the rapid progression of beta-cell destruction. Intensive treatment of LADA with insulin may improve this type of patients' quality of life, and so potentially save the beta-cell function and perhaps lessening the risk of a hyperglycemic crisis
Original Articles
The Prevalence of Islet Cell Cytoplasmic Antibody in Korean Type 1 Diabetes: Possible Replacement with Combined Measurement of Anti-GAD, Anti-ICA512, and Anti-phogrin Antibodies.
Kyoung Ah Kim, Dong Jun Kim, Jae Hoon Chung, Yong Ki Min, Moon Kyu Lee, Kwang Won Kim, Dong Kyu Jin, Kyung Soo Ko, Sang Jin Kim, Myung Shik Lee
Korean Diabetes J. 2001;25(6):430-445.   Published online December 1, 2001
  • 1,530 View
  • 23 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
BACKGROUND
Type 1 diabetes includes all forms of autoimmune-mediated and idiopathic beta-cell destruction leading to an absolute insulin deficiency. Evidence of an autoimmune pathogenesis was assessed by studying cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies (ICA), antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), antibodies reacting with an islet tyrosine phosphatase-related molecule referred to as ICA512 (ICA512A), or its homologue phogrin (phogrin-A). In comparison with ICA, the best validation to assess the risk of type 1 diabetes, shows that a combination of antibodies to GADA with ICA512A has the power to detect a majority of ICA and 97~100% of subjects who progressed to overt diabetes. These findings suggest the possibility of replacing the laborious ICA test in the screening programs to identify subjects at risk of progressing to type 1 diabetes or forclassifying the stage of diabetes at the time of diagnosis. Up to now, it is unclear whether these results are applicable to the slowly progressive type 1 diabetes that appears to be more prevalent in Asian than in western countries. The prevalence of combined autoantibody testing (1 of GADA, ICA512A, or phogrin-A) was investigated in the patients with type 1 diabetes (typical and slowly progressive) and type 2 diabetes, and compared with that of ICA which is a more laborious and insensitive test. METHODS: The ICA assay was performed using immunoenzymatic staining of frozen human (blood group O) pancreatic sections with serial dilutions of serum samples with peroxidase-labeled protein A. For the GADA determination, commercially available GADA radioimmunoassay kits utilizing the 125I-labeled recombinant GAD65 (RSR , United Kingdom) as an antigen was used. Either ICA512A or phogrin-A were detected by a radioligand-binding assay after in vitro transcription and translation using the clone ICA512bdc or phogrin cDNA. Serum was obtainedfrom 76 patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 22.8+/-14.0 years), 22 patients with slowly progressive type 1 diabetes (mean age 37.9+/-13.9 years) and 39 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age 45.3+/-12.3 years). Typical and slowly progressive type 1 diabetes patients had the disease for between 4.0+/-4.6 and 10.1+/-9.5 years, respectively at the earliest serum sampling. RESULTS: 1) In typical type 1 diabetes, 30% of patients tested positive for ICA and 57% for the combined autoantibody test (1 of GADA, ICA512A, or phogrin-A). In the slowly progressive type 1 diabetes group, 18% of patients tested positive for ICA and 50% for the combined autoantibody test. In type 2 diabetes, 7.7% and 5.1% tested positive, respectively. 2) Ninety-six percent of ICA-positive patients expressed one or more of the 3 auto-antibody specificities in typical type 1 diabetes. Among the 53 ICA-negative patients with typical type 1 diabetes, 40% had one or more of these auto-antibodies. In the slowly progressive type 1 diabetes, 100% of the ICA-positive and 39% of the ICA- negative patients expressed one or more of the 3 autoantibody specificities. 3) Of the 23 patients with ICA-positive typical type 1 diabetes patients, 87% had a positive result for GADA, 48% for ICA512A, 44% for phogrin-A, and 96% for GADA or ICA512A. Of the 4 patients with ICA-positive slowly progressive type 1 diabetes, three had a positive result for GADA, and 1 for ICA512A. 4) When the prevalence of combined autoantibody testing was analyzed according to the duration of diabetes, the prevalence in patients tested within 4 years after the diagnosis and more than 4 years after the diagnosis was 61% and 52%, respectively in typical type 1 diabetes. Furthermore, that for the ICA was 37% and 21%, respectively. In the slowly progressive type 1 diabetes, the prevalence of combined auto-antibody testing was 88% and 25%, respectively (p<0.05), while that of ICA was 25% and 13%, respectively. 5) In typical type 1 diabetes, ICA were detected more frequently in patients younger than 15 years of age (48%) than in older patients (23%) (p<0.05), while the prevalence of combined auto-antibody testing -was not different according to the onset age (65% vs 53%). CONCLUSION: Combined autoantibody testing for GADA and ICA512A is more sensitive that ICA in type 1 diabetes. Therefore, it could replace the laborious ICA measurement and may be useful for discriminating the etiology of adult onset atypical diabetes.
Measurement of Anti-Phogrin Antibody in Korean Autoimmune Deabetes; Comparison to Anti-IA-2 Antibody.
Moon kyu Lee, Yong Ki Min, Myung Shik Lee, Sung Hoon Kim, Byoung Joon Kim, Dong Jun Kim, Jong Ryeal Hahm, Dong Kyu Jin, Kyoung Ah Kim, Kwang Won Kim
Korean Diabetes J. 1999;23(3):269-277.   Published online January 1, 2001
  • 1,371 View
  • 21 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
BACKGROUND
Since the discovery of IA-2 as a major autoantigen in type 1 diabetes, the question arose as to whether other PTPs (protein tyrosine phosphatases) could act as diabetic autoantigens as well. A novel PTP, designated IA-2 B (phogrin; phosphatase homologue in granules of insulinoma) was isolated that has a high sequence similarity to IA-2. Since some studies suggested that auto- immunity to phogrin, rather than IA-2 may be more closely associated with the development of type 1 diabetes, we measured the frequency of anti-phogrin antibody in Korean patients with type 1 diabetes and compared it with that of anti-IA-2 antibody/ anti-GAD antibody. METHODS: The anti-phogrin antibody and the anti-IA-2 antibody were measured by radioligand binding assays using in vitro transcribed and translated S-labeled phogrin and IA-2, respectively. Anti-GAD antibody was measured using a commercial radioimmunoassay kit (RSR, Cardiff, U.K.). The subjects in this study consisted of 41 patients with classical type 1 diabetes, 22 with slowly progressive type 1 diabetes, and 39 with type 2 diabetes. Their average mean age was 16.9 years, 37.9 years and 45.3 years respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of anti-phogrin antibody, anti-IA-2 antibody and anti-GAD antibody in classical type 1 diabetes was 24.4%, 26.8% and 51.2% respectively. That, in slowly progressive type 1 diabetes was 0%, 9.1% and 40.9% respectively. When the anti-GAD antibody assay and the anti-IA-2 antibody assay were combined, the prevalence of autoantibodies was 58.5% in classical type 1 diabetes and 50% in slowly progressive type I diabetes. However, the addition of the anti-phogrin antibody to the anti-GAD antibody/anti-IA-2 antibody measurement did not significantly increase the prevalence of autoantibody. The level of the antiphogrin antibody was positively correlated with that of the anti-IA-2 antibody. The presence of the anti-phogrin antibody and the anti-IA-2 antibody was negatively correlated with the age at diagnosis. One patient with type 1 diabetes had the anti-phogrin antibody without the anti-IA-2 antibody. CONCLUSION: Combined measurement of the anti-phogrin antibody with the anti-IA-2 antibody/ anti-GAD antibody did not significantly increase the prevalence of autoantibodies in Korean patients with type 1 diabetes. In the majority of Korean type 1 diabetes patients, the anti-phogrin antibody appears to share epitopes with the anti-IA-2 antibody. However, a small proportion of type 1 diabetes patients may have a specific autoimmune response to phogrin.
Combined Measurements of Anti-ICA512 and Anti-GAD Antibodies in Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Slowly Progressive Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus in Korea.
Kyoung Ah Kim, Kyu Jung Ahn, Jae Hoon Chung, Yong Ki Min, Moon Kyu Lee, Phil Soo Oh, Dong Kyu Jin, Byung Tae Kim, Hae Joon Park, Kwang Won Kim, Myung Shik Lee
Korean Diabetes J. 1998;22(4):482-490.   Published online January 1, 2001
  • 1,385 View
  • 19 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
BACKGROUND
Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic autoimmune disease in which circulating antibodies to various islet-specific antigens including autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADAb), antibodies reacting with an islet tyrosine phosphatase-related molecule termed as ICA512 (ICA512Ab), and insulin autoantibodies are frequently detected. These autoantibodies could be useful for presymptomatic diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus, and tbeir presence suggest some patients with atypical diabetes mellitus that appears to be more prevalent in Asian than in western countries have autoimmune characteristics. ICA512Ab was discovered in 1992 and, when combined with GADAb, may increase the diagnostic sensitivity in autoimmune diabetes. In an attempt to study the autoimmune feature of atypical diabetes mellitus, we studied the prevalence of ICA512Ab using an in vitro transcription and translation method in the patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), slowly progressive insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (SPIDDM) and non-msulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and compared it with that of GADAb. METHODS: ICA512Ab were measured by a radioimmunoprecipitation method using in vitro transcribed and translated S-methionine-labeled ICA512. GADAb were measured using a commercial radioimmunoassay kit (RSR, United Kingdom). The subjects in this study consisted of 43 patients with IDDM, 32 with SPIDDM, and 40 witb NIDDM. Their mean age was 21.2+14.5 years, 50.1+17.1 years, 52.5+13.4 years, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of ICA512Ab and GADAb in IDDM was 29 % and 51 %, respectively. That in SPIDDM was 9 % and 29 %; in NIDDM, 0 % and 2.5 %, respectively. When two antibodies were combined, 60 % of IDDM and 50 % of SPIDDM had the autoantibodies. When we analyzed the prevalence of autoantibodies according to the duration of diabetes, the prevalence of ICA 512Ab in patients tested within 4 years after the rliagnosis and more than 4 years after the diagnosis was 35 % and 19 %, respectively in IDDM. And also that of GADAb was 59 % and 38 %, respectively. In SPlDDM, the prevalence of ICA512Ab was 13 % and 7 %, respectively, while that of GADAb was 67 % and 14 % (p<0.05), respectively. In IDDM, ICA512Ab were more frequently detected in patients younger than 15 years ot age (45 %) than in older ones (14%) (p<0.05) while the prevalence of GADAb was not different according to the age (55 % vs 44 %). CONCLUSION: ICA512Ab are detected in some patients with autoimmune diabetes, while their prevalence is lower than that of GADAb. However, ICA512Ab, in combination with GADAb, increases the sensitivity ot autoantibody tests in autoimmune diabetes. Some of SPIDDM have an autoimmune etiology.

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Close layer
TOP