Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal

Search
OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Akinobu Nakamura"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Complications
Article image
Switching from Conventional Fibrates to Pemafibrate Has Beneficial Effects on the Renal Function of Diabetic Subjects with Chronic Kidney Disease
Rimi Izumihara, Hiroshi Nomoto, Kenichi Kito, Yuki Yamauchi, Kazuno Omori, Yui Shibayama, Shingo Yanagiya, Aika Miya, Hiraku Kameda, Kyu Yong Cho, So Nagai, Ichiro Sakuma, Akinobu Nakamura, Tatsuya Atsumi, on Behalf of the PARM-TD Study Group
Diabetes Metab J. 2024;48(3):473-481.   Published online February 29, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2023.0370
  • 2,199 View
  • 364 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReader   ePub   
Background
Fibrates have renal toxicity limiting their use in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, pemafibrate has fewer toxic effects on renal function. In the present analysis, we evaluated the effects of pemafibrate on the renal function of diabetic subjects with or without CKD in a real-world clinical setting.
Methods
We performed a sub-analysis of data collected during a multi-center, prospective, observational study of the effects of pemafibrate on lipid metabolism in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by hypertriglyceridemia (the PARM-T2D study). The participants were allocated to add pemafibrate to their existing regimen (ADD-ON), switch from their existing fibrate to pemafibrate (SWITCH), or continue conventional therapy (CTRL). The changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 52 weeks were compared among these groups as well as among subgroups created according to CKD status.
Results
Data for 520 participants (ADD-ON, n=166; SWITCH, n=96; CTRL, n=258) were analyzed. Of them, 56.7% had CKD. The eGFR increased only in the SWITCH group, and this trend was also present in the CKD subgroup (P<0.001). On the other hand, eGFR was not affected by switching in participants with severe renal dysfunction (G3b or G4) and/or macroalbuminuria. Multivariate analysis showed that being older and a switch from fenofibrate were associated with elevation in eGFR (both P<0.05).
Conclusion
A switch to pemafibrate may be associated with an elevation in eGFR, but to a lesser extent in patients with poor renal function.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Research hotspots and future trends in lipid metabolism in chronic kidney disease: a bibliometric and visualization analysis from 2004 to 2023
    Ying Wang, Tongtong Liu, Weijing Liu, Hailing Zhao, Ping Li
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Conversion from Conventional Pemafibrate to Novel Pemafibrate XR on Hypertriglyceridemia: An Observational Retrospective Study
    Yuki Hida, Teruhiko Imamura, Koichiro Kinugawa
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(19): 5879.     CrossRef
Drug/Regimen
Article image
Switching to Once-Daily Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart from Basal Insulin Improves Postprandial Glycemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial
Kyu Yong Cho, Akinobu Nakamura, Chiho Oba-Yamamoto, Kazuhisa Tsuchida, Shingo Yanagiya, Naoki Manda, Yoshio Kurihara, Shin Aoki, Tatsuya Atsumi, Hideaki Miyoshi
Diabetes Metab J. 2020;44(4):532-541.   Published online November 22, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2019.0093
  • 6,543 View
  • 175 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReader   ePub   
Background

To explore the efficacy and safety of switching from once-daily basal insulin therapy to once-daily pre-meal injection insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) with respect to the glycemic control of participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

In this multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparison trial, participants on basal insulin therapy were switched to IDegAsp (IDegAsp group; n=30) or continued basal insulin (Basal group; n=29). The primary endpoint was the superiority of IDegAsp in causing changes in the daily blood glucose profile, especially post-prandial blood glucose concentration after 12 weeks.

Results

Blood glucose concentrations after dinner and before bedtime were lower in the IDegAsp group, and the improvement in blood glucose before bedtime was significantly greater in the IDegAsp group than in the Basal group at 12 weeks (−1.7±3.0 mmol/L vs. 0.3±2.1 mmol/L, P<0.05). Intriguingly, glycemic control after breakfast was not improved by IDegAsp injection before breakfast, in contrast to the favorable effect of injection before dinner on blood glucose after dinner. Glycosylated hemoglobin significantly decreased only in the IDegAsp group (58 to 55 mmol/mol, P<0.05). Changes in daily insulin dose, body mass, and recorded adverse effects, including hypoglycemia, were comparable between groups.

Conclusion

IDegAsp was more effective than basal insulin at reducing blood glucose after dinner and before bedtime, but did not increase the incidence of hypoglycemia. Switching from basal insulin to IDegAsp does not increase the burden on the patient and positively impacts glycemic control in patients with T2DM.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Glycaemic outcomes in hospital with IDegAsp versus BIAsp30 premixed insulins
    Joshua R. Walt, Julie Loughran, Spiros Fourlanos, Rahul D. Barmanray, Jasmine Zhu, Suresh Varadarajan, Mervyn Kyi
    Internal Medicine Journal.2024; 54(8): 1329.     CrossRef
  • The efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs: The Soli‐D randomized controlled trial
    Ming Liu, Weijun Gu, Li Chen, Yanbing Li, Hongyu Kuang, Jianling Du, Agustina Alvarez, Felipe Lauand, Elisabeth Souhami, Jiewen Zhang, Weiya Xu, Qin Du, Yiming Mu
    Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism.2024; 26(9): 3791.     CrossRef
  • Cutting-edge microneedle innovations: Transforming the landscape of cardiovascular and metabolic disease management
    Xiaoning Zhang, Ming Li, Qiang Gao, Xiaoya Kang, Jingyao Sun, Yao Huang, Hong Xu, Jing Xu, Songren Shu, Jian Zhuang, Yuan Huang
    iScience.2024; 27(9): 110615.     CrossRef
  • Low fasting glucose‐to‐estimated average glucose ratio was associated with superior response to insulin degludec/aspart compared with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Han Na Jang, Ye Seul Yang, Tae Jung Oh, Bo Kyung Koo, Seong Ok Lee, Kyong Soo Park, Hak Chul Jang, Hye Seung Jung
    Journal of Diabetes Investigation.2022; 13(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Comparing Time to Intensification between insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart and Insulin Glargine
    Rajiv Kovil
    Journal of Diabetology.2022; 13(2): 171.     CrossRef
  • Use of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: Expert Panel Recommendations on Appropriate Practice Patterns
    Tevfik Demir, Serap Turan, Kursad Unluhizarci, Oya Topaloglu, Tufan Tukek, Dilek Gogas Yavuz
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pharmacoeconomic comparison of the second generation insulin analogs and insulins on their base
    I. N. Dyakov, S. K. Zyryanov
    Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice.2021; 20(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart Compared with a Conventional Premixed Insulin or Basal Insulin: A Meta-Analysis
    Shinje Moon, Hye-Soo Chung, Yoon-Jung Kim, Jae-Myung Yu, Woo-Ju Jeong, Jiwon Park, Chang-Myung Oh
    Metabolites.2021; 11(9): 639.     CrossRef
  • Insulin therapy in diabetic kidney disease
    Yan Liu, Chanyue Zhao, Xiaofen Xiong, Ming Yang, Lin Sun
    Diabetic Nephropathy.2021; 1(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide and insulin degludec/insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes patients not controlled on basal insulin
    Anwar Ali Jammah
    Primary Care Diabetes.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Close layer
TOP