Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal

Search
OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse > Author index
Search
Hyun Jeong Jeon  (Jeon HJ) 3 Articles
Metabolic Risk/Epidemiology
Article image
Current Status of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target Achievement in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Korea Compared with Recent Guidelines
Soo Jin Yun, In-Kyung Jeong, Jin-Hye Cha, Juneyoung Lee, Ho Chan Cho, Sung Hee Choi, SungWan Chun, Hyun Jeong Jeon, Ho-Cheol Kang, Sang Soo Kim, Seung-Hyun Ko, Gwanpyo Koh, Su Kyoung Kwon, Jae Hyuk Lee, Min Kyong Moon, Junghyun Noh, Cheol-Young Park, Sungrae Kim
Diabetes Metab J. 2022;46(3):464-475.   Published online March 3, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0088
  • 7,661 View
  • 366 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReader   ePub   
Background
We evaluated the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) according to up-to-date Korean Diabetes Association (KDA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS), and American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study collected electronic medical record data from patients with T2DM (≥20 years) managed by endocrinologists from 15 hospitals in Korea (January to December 2019). Patients were categorized according to guidelines to assess LDL-C target achievement. KDA (2019): Very High-I (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD]) <70 mg/dL; Very High-II (target organ damage [TOD], or cardiovascular risk factors [CVRFs]) <70 mg/dL; high (others) <100 mg/dL. ESC/EAS (2019): Very High-I (ASCVD): <55 mg/dL; Very High-II (TOD or ≥3-CVRF) <55 mg/dL; high (diabetes ≥10 years without TOD plus any CVRF) <70 mg/dL; moderate (diabetes <10 years without CVRF) <100 mg/dL. ADA (2019): Very High-I (ASCVD); Very High-II (age ≥40+ TOD, or any CVRF), for high intensity statin or statin combined with ezetimibe.
Results
Among 2,000 T2DM patients (mean age 62.6 years; male 55.9%; mean glycosylated hemoglobin 7.2%) ASCVD prevalence was 24.7%. Of 1,455 (72.8%) patients treated with statins, 73.9% received monotherapy. According to KDA guidelines, LDL-C target achievement rates were 55.2% in Very High-I and 34.9% in Very High-II patients. With ESC/EAS guidelines, target attainment rates were 26.6% in Very High-I, 15.7% in Very High-II, and 25.9% in high risk patients. Based on ADA guidelines, most patients (78.9%) were very-high risk; however, only 15.5% received high-intensity statin or combination therapy.
Conclusion
According to current dyslipidemia management guidelines, LDL-C goal achievement remains suboptimal in Korean patients with T2DM.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factor control and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Do Kyeong Song, Young Sun Hong, Yeon-Ah Sung, Hyejin Lee, Hidetaka Hamasaki
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(2): e0299035.     CrossRef
  • Distinct effects of rosuvastatin and rosuvastatin/ezetimibe on senescence markers of CD8+ T cells in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial
    Sang-Hyeon Ju, Joung Youl Lim, Minchul Song, Ji Min Kim, Yea Eun Kang, Hyon-Seung Yi, Kyong Hye Joung, Ju Hee Lee, Hyun Jin Kim, Bon Jeong Ku
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Monitoring Global Progress in Core Diabetes Control Metrics: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Prevalence (2015–2023)
    John McCaffrey, Samira Barbara Jabakhanji, Roopa Mehta, Steven James, Maisoon Mairghani, Dominika Bhatia, Hazel Ní Chonchubhair, Killian Walsh, Barbara Clyne, Edward W. Gregg
    HRB Open Research.2024; 7: 27.     CrossRef
  • Lipid Management in Korean People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Consensus Statement
    Ye Seul Yang, Hack-Lyoung Kim, Sang-Hyun Kim, Min Kyong Moon
    Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis.2023; 12(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Lipid Management in Korean People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Consensus Statement
    Ye Seul Yang, Hack-Lyoung Kim, Sang-Hyun Kim, Min Kyong Moon
    Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2023; 47(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Management of Dyslipidemia in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
    Kyung Ae Lee
    The Journal of Korean Diabetes.2023; 24(3): 111.     CrossRef
  • Association between carotid atherosclerosis and presence of intracranial atherosclerosis using three-dimensional high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes
    Ji Eun Jun, You-Cheol Hwang, Kyu Jeong Ahn, Ho Yeon Chung, Geon-Ho Jahng, Soonchan Park, In-Kyung Jeong, Chang-Woo Ryu
    Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.2022; 191: 110067.     CrossRef
Comparison of Vildagliptin-Metformin and Glimepiride-Metformin Treatments in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Hyun Jeong Jeon, Tae Keun Oh
Diabetes Metab J. 2011;35(5):529-535.   Published online October 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2011.35.5.529
  • 65,535 View
  • 114 Download
  • 25 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader   
Background

The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin-metformin treatment compared to those of glimepiride-metformin treatment for type 2 diabetes.

Methods

In a randomized, open-label, comparative study, 106 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled. The primary endpoint was a reduction in HbA1c from baseline and secondary endpoints included fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or 2-hour postprandial glucose (2h-PPG) reduction from baseline, as well as HbA1c responder rate and HbA1c reduction according to baseline HbA1c category.

Results

Comparable HbA1c reduction was observed with a mean±standard deviation change from baseline to the 32-week endpoint of -0.94±1.15% in the vildagliptin group and -1.00±1.32% in the glimepiride group. A similar reduction in 2h-PPG (vildagliptin group 3.53±4.11 mmol/L vs. the glimepiride group 3.72±4.17 mmol/L) was demonstrated, and the decrements in FPG (vildagliptin group 1.54±2.41 mmol/L vs. glimepiride group 2.16±2.51 mmol/L) were not different between groups. The proportion of patients who achieved an HbA1c less than 7% at week 32 was 50.1% in the vildagliptin group and 56.0% in the glimepiride group. An average body weight gain of 2.53±1.21 kg in the glimepiride group was observed in contrast with the 0.23±0.69 kg weight gain noted in the vildagliptin group. A 10-fold lower incidence of hypoglycemia was demonstrated in the vildagliptin group, in addition to an absence of severe hypoglycemia.

Conclusion

Vildagliptin-metformin treatment provided blood glucose control efficacy comparable to that of glimepiride-metformin treatment and resulted in better adverse event profiles with lower risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Randomized, Two-Treatments, Two-Periods, Crossover, Open label, Laboratory-Blind, Single Dose Bioequivalence Study between Vildagliptin/Metformin 50 mg/1000 mg Film Coated Tablets (Sensityn®) and Galvusmet® 50 mg/1000 mg Film Coated Tablets in healthy a
    J. Shiekmydeen, T. Siddiqi, K. Chakraborty, S. Khalaf, M. Albarazi, I. Eqtefan, J. Sliva
    European Pharmaceutical Journal.2023; 70(2): 1.     CrossRef
  • Bioequivalence Studies of New Generic Formulations of Vildagliptin and Fixed-Drug Combination of Vildagliptin and Metformin Versus Respective Originator Products in Healthy Volunteers
    Yvonne Schnaars, Sumedh Gaikwad, Ulrike Gottwald-Hostalek, Ulrike Klingberg, Hari Kiran Chary Vadla, Vamshi Ramana Prathap
    Diabetes Therapy.2022; 13(6): 1215.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of dorzagliatin for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Yunfeng Yu, Xingyu Yang, Keke Tong, Shuang Yin, Gang Hu, Fei Zhang, Pengfei Jiang, Manli Zhou, Weixiong Jian
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Single-Center, Observational, Retrospective Cost-Effective Analysis of Treating Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Addition of DPP4 Inhibitors Versus Intensified Treatment with Conventional Drugs
    Akshata Kalyani, Sachin Kuchya, >Prashant Punekar
    Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics.2021; 12(3): 125.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of safety and efficacy of glimepiride-metformin and vildagliptin- metformin treatment in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients
    Surendra Kumar
    Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism.2021; 25(4): 326.     CrossRef
  • Comparative clinical study evaluating the effect of adding Vildagliptin versus Glimepiride to ongoing Metformin therapy on diabetic patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease
    Rehab Werida, Mahmoud Kabel, Gamal Omran, Ahmed Shokry, Tarek Mostafa
    Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.2020; 170: 108473.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of different antidiabetic drugs based on metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis involving eight eligible randomized‐controlled trials
    Yan Peng, Shu‐Hong Chen, Xiao‐Nan Liu, Qing‐Yun Sun
    Journal of Cellular Physiology.2019; 234(3): 2795.     CrossRef
  • A safety and tolerability profile comparison between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Daniela Farah, Graziella Malzoni Leme, Freddy Goldberg Eliaschewitz, Marcelo Cunio Machado Fonseca
    Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.2019; 149: 47.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East‐Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐arm, active comparator, phase III trial
    Yu Hong Chen, Chien‐Ning Huang, Young Min Cho, Pengfei Li, Liqun Gu, Feng Wang, Jun Yang, Wei Qing Wang
    Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism.2018; 20(9): 2121.     CrossRef
  • Cost effectiveness of vildagliptin versus glimepiride as add-on treatment to metformin for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 patients in Greece
    Hara Kousoulakou, Magdalini Hatzikou, Varvara Baroutsou, John Yfantopoulos
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The efficacy and safety of adding either vildagliptin or glimepiride to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Gyuri Kim, Sewon Oh, Sang-Man Jin, Kyu Yeon Hur, Jae Hyeon Kim, Moon-Kyu Lee
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.2017; 18(12): 1179.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of efficacy of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review
    Helene Bihan, Winda L. Ng, Dianna J. Magliano, Jonathan E. Shaw
    Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.2016; 121: 27.     CrossRef
  • New Oral Diabetes Drugs are more effective than Older Agents: Real or a Fraud?
    Udaya M Kabadi
    Journal of Diabetes, Metabolic Disorders & Control.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of vildagliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes
    Eleni Bekiari, Chrysoula Rizava, Eleni Athanasiadou, Konstantinos Papatheodorou, Aris Liakos, Thomas Karagiannis, Maria Mainou, Maria Rika, Panagiota Boura, Apostolos Tsapas
    Endocrine.2016; 52(3): 458.     CrossRef
  • Sulfonylurea Glimepiride: A Proven Cost Effective, Safe and Reliable War Horse in Combating Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes
    Udaya M. Kabadi
    Journal of Diabetes Mellitus.2015; 05(04): 211.     CrossRef
  • Glycemic effects of vildagliptin and metformin combination therapy in Indian patients with type 2 diabetes: An observational study (印度2型糖尿病患者使用维格列汀与二甲双胍联合治疗对血糖的影响:一项观察性研究)
    Sanjay Chatterjee, Sudip Chatterjee
    Journal of Diabetes.2014; 6(3): 237.     CrossRef
  • Head‐to‐head comparison of dipeptidyl peptidase‐IV inhibitors and sulfonylureas – a meta‐analysis from randomized clinical trials
    Yifei Zhang, Jie Hong, Jie Chi, Weiqiong Gu, Guang Ning, Weiqing Wang
    Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews.2014; 30(3): 241.     CrossRef
  • Vildagliptin: A Review of Its Use in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Gillian M. Keating
    Drugs.2014; 74(5): 587.     CrossRef
  • Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients
    Giuseppe Derosa, Aldo Bonaventura, Lucio Bianchi, Davide Romano, Elena Fogari, Angela D’Angelo, Pamela Maffioli
    Metabolism.2014; 63(7): 957.     CrossRef
  • The Placement of DPP-4 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Treatment of Types 2 Diabetes
    Jaime A. Davidson
    Endocrine Practice.2013; 19(6): 1050.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Clinical Parameters and Glycemic Efficacy of Vildagliptin Treatment in Korean Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes
    Jin-Sun Chang, Juyoung Shin, Hun-Sung Kim, Kyung-Hee Kim, Jeong-Ah Shin, Kun-Ho Yoon, Bong-Yun Cha, Ho-Young Son, Jae-Hyoung Cho
    Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2013; 37(1): 72.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy of Vildagliptin in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Jun Sung Moon, Kyu Chang Won
    Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2013; 37(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Vildagliptin on Glucose and Insulin Concentrations During a 24-Hour Period in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Different Ranges of Baseline Hemoglobin A1c Levels
    Manuel González-Ortiz, María J. Sánchez-Peña, Luis J. González-Ortiz, José A. Robles-Cervantes, Yessica E. García-Ortega, Esteban A. Gómez-Gaitán, Karina G. Pérez-Rubio, Esperanza Martínez-Abundis
    Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.2013; 15(7): 564.     CrossRef
  • Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring
    Y. L. He, G. Foteinos, S. Neelakantham, D. Mattapalli, K. Kulmatycki, T. Forst, A. Taylor
    Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism.2013; 15(12): 1111.     CrossRef
  • Combination therapy with metformin plus vildagliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Elisa Guarino, Laura Nigi, Aurora Patti, Cecilia Fondelli, Francesco Dotta
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.2012; 13(9): 1377.     CrossRef
Drug/Regimen
Article image
Efficacy and Safety of Metformin and Atorvastatin Combination Therapy vs. Monotherapy with Either Drug in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia Patients (ATOMIC): Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Jie-Eun Lee, Seung Hee Yu, Sung Rae Kim, Kyu Jeung Ahn, Kee-Ho Song, In-Kyu Lee, Ho-Sang Shon, In Joo Kim, Soo Lim, Doo-Man Kim, Choon Hee Chung, Won-Young Lee, Soon Hee Lee, Dong Joon Kim, Sung-Rae Cho, Chang Hee Jung, Hyun Jeong Jeon, Seung-Hwan Lee, Keun-Young Park, Sang Youl Rhee, Sin Gon Kim, Seok O Park, Dae Jung Kim, Byung Joon Kim, Sang Ah Lee, Yong-Hyun Kim, Kyung-Soo Kim, Ji A Seo, Il Seong Nam-Goong, Chang Won Lee, Duk Kyu Kim, Sang Wook Kim, Chung Gu Cho, Jung Han Kim, Yeo-Joo Kim, Jae-Myung Yoo, Kyung Wan Min, Moon-Kyu Lee
Received March 8, 2023  Accepted June 28, 2023  Published online May 20, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2023.0077    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 1,461 View
  • 109 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReader   ePub   
Background
It is well known that a large number of patients with diabetes also have dyslipidemia, which significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination drugs consisting of metformin and atorvastatin, widely used as therapeutic agents for diabetes and dyslipidemia.
Methods
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group and phase III multicenter study included adults with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels >7.0% and <10.0%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >100 and <250 mg/dL. One hundred eighty-five eligible subjects were randomized to the combination group (metformin+atorvastatin), metformin group (metformin+atorvastatin placebo), and atorvastatin group (atorvastatin+metformin placebo). The primary efficacy endpoints were the percent changes in HbA1c and LDL-C levels from baseline at the end of the treatment.
Results
After 16 weeks of treatment compared to baseline, HbA1c showed a significant difference of 0.94% compared to the atorvastatin group in the combination group (0.35% vs. −0.58%, respectively; P<0.0001), whereas the proportion of patients with increased HbA1c was also 62% and 15%, respectively, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). The combination group also showed a significant decrease in LDL-C levels compared to the metformin group (−55.20% vs. −7.69%, P<0.001) without previously unknown adverse drug events.
Conclusion
The addition of atorvastatin to metformin improved HbA1c and LDL-C levels to a significant extent compared to metformin or atorvastatin alone in diabetes and dyslipidemia patients. This study also suggested metformin’s preventive effect on the glucose-elevating potential of atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, insufficiently controlled with exercise and diet. Metformin and atorvastatin combination might be an effective treatment in reducing the CVD risk in patients with both diabetes and dyslipidemia because of its lowering effect on LDL-C and glucose.

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Close layer